UK smart meter activists facing same propaganda/lies utilities are using around the world

Smart Meters – Commons Select Committee Meeting (Clip 1 of 6)

Published on May 3, 2013

This video series shows the Commons Select Committee enquiry into the UK Smart Meter roll-out held on Tuesday 23rd April 2013. Witnesses appearing to give evidence to the Committee in the first session include Dr Elizabeth Evans and Mike Mitcham from Stop Smart Meters! (UK), alongside Dr Jill Meara, representing Public Health England, and Dr John Swanson, from the Biological Effects Policy Advisory Group for the Institute of Engineering and Technology.

The representatives from Stop Smart Meters! (UK) share their concerns about adverse health effects from wireless smart meters due to the pulsed microwave radiation that is emitted 24/7 by these meters, up to 190,000 pulses a day – acute effects (insomnia, headaches, nausea, anxiety and depression, fatigue and memory/concentration problems) and chronic effects (including increased risk of cancer, infertility, dementia, immune system dysfunction, damage to fetuses); environmental damage from wireless smart meters – RF radiation affecting bees, plants, trees, birds etc and the inherent energy-inefficiency of wireless technology: cybersecurity problems – leaving homes and communities vulnerable to hacking of their smart meters; privacy issues – concerning the masses of real-time data on energy usage collected by the utility company which gives a detailed picture of family life inside a home with a smart meter, who will have access to that data, and how that data will be used; and the specter of higher bills resulting from smart meters – as has been the experience in Canada where 80% of Smart Meter users complain of higher bills within a year of installation, often more that 50% higher.

Stop Smart Meters! (UK)


THE LILLY WAVE – riding on 60Hz into our homes and into our minds!

Electrical Stimulation of the BraIn

The goal was to find an electric current waveform with which animals could be stimulated through implanted electrodes for several hours per day for several months without causing irreversible changes in threshold by the passage of current through the tissue.

Many waveforms, including 60-cps. sine-wave current could apparently be used safely for these limited schedules of stimulation. They could not be used for the intensive, long-term schedule of chronic stimulation. Electric current passed through the brain can cause at least two distinct types of injury: thermal and electrolytic.

The technical problem in chronic brain stimulation is to stay above the excitatory threshold and below the injury threshold in the neuronal system under consideration. This result can be achieved most easily by the proper choice of waveforms and their time courses; and less easily by the choice of the range of repetition frequencies and train durations.

The previous wave forms used in neurophysiology and in neurosurgery injured the neurons when unidirectional current passed through the brain. Dr. Lilly developed a new electrical wave form to balance the current, first in one direction and then, after a brief interval, in the other. Thus ions moving in the neurons would first be pushed one way and then quickly the other way, stimulating the neurons and leaving the ions in their former positions within the neurons. This new wave form was called a balanced bidirectional pulse pair, or the Lilly Wave. Microscopic studies of brains stimulated with this balanced pulse pair showed that there was no injury of the neuronai networks from this kind of stimulation.

Waveform of stimulating current: pulse pairs of current resulting from quasi-differentiation, with passive electrical elements, of a rectangular pulse. Measured at 2 percent of the peak, the duration of the positive pulse (upward) is 34 µsec, and the duration of the negative pulse (downward) is 28 µsec.


SMUD Board Meeting in California

Chilling testimony of the harm smart meters are causing to the public. John Echols is suing SMUD because of the damage and harm.

SMUD harassed and terrorized Mr. Echols. This is happening every day in our America; Land of the Free!!

Complaint link:


Carl Sagan on the dangers of not questioning new technology

The interview clip originally aired on “Charlie Rose” on May 27, 1996.


A Science Icon Died 17 Years Ago. In His Last Interview, He Made A Warning That Gives Me Goosebumps.

Rajiv Narayan Rajiv Narayan

Carl Sagan inspired a generation of scientists with his work in and out of the classroom. But he didn’t always present science with cheer. In this clip, he passionately defends science with a grave warning. It’s something we all need to hear.



The Science of Exposure – Wireless Radiation

Uploaded on Jun 2, 2014

Three science and medical professionals explain how the brain of a developing baby may be affected during pregnancy by exposure to wireless radiation emitted from cell phones and other wireless devices. This video is part of the BabySafe Project, online at
Environmental Health Trust
Education, Research and Policy to Reduce Environmental Risks

The Baby Safe Project

is a joint initiative

Grassroots Environmental Education
Environmental Health Trust
The Baby Safe Project

Please join us at 10:30 am (EST) on June 3rd for a LIVE press conference from New York City announcing the BabySafe Project, a new public awareness initiative designed to inform women about the links between pregnancy and wireless radiation.

Learn more

What You Should Know About Wireless Radiation and Your Baby

Download the free brochure:

Learn more

Joint Statement on Pregnancy and Wireless Radiation
The goals of the Project have been endorsed by many of the world’s leading experts in the fields of microwave radiation, brain development, obstetrics, pediatrics and public health. Read the Joint Statement on Wireless Radiation and Pregnancy and view a list of signatories.

Learn more

The Baby Safe Project


Protect Your Pregnancy From Wireless Radiation

Do you want to expose your fetus and children to smart meters?

Protect Your Pregnancy From Wireless Radiation
Uploaded on May 29, 2014

For more information go to:

Four moms talk about their decision to avoid wireless radiation from cell phones and wireless networks during pregnancy, and Dr. Hugh Taylor from Yale University talks about his study linking exposure to wireless radiation to neurological and behavioral problems including symptoms resembling attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Learn more about wireless radiation and pregnancy at and join the conversation on Twitter at #KnowYourExposure.