Opinion: “Why Isn’t Our Government Protecting Us?” Environmental Health Trust Resources Alert On Health Risks of 5G Rollout


Opinion: “Why Isn’t Our Government Protecting Us?” Environmental Health Trust Resources Alert On Health Risks of 5G Rollout

    • 15 SEP 18

    Opinion: “Why Isn’t Our Government Protecting Us?” Environmental Health Trust Resources Alert On Health Risks of 5G Rollout

    August 25, 2018 | Theodora Scarato

    From the Daily Clout


    Is a “smart world” necessarily good for us?

    Connecting your smartphone to your TV, dishwasher, and even to your child’s Barbie doll, is now all the rage. Boosting wi-fi in places where it never used to exist — from appliances to toys — is being hailed as the new ideal.  “5G” is the name of the new technology that will enable us to connect all of our ‘smart’ devices anytime and anyplace with super-fast speeds to “the internet of things.” Telecommunications companies are promising us that 5G and the new “digital ecosystem” will make our lives more convenient, safer and happier.

    However, this magical rollout is not without serious costs to our health. Telecommunications companies tell us that only way to create this 5G network is to install hundreds of thousands of new cellular antennas and cell towers nationwide — indeed, right in our own front yards.

    Wireless might be invisible, but it is not magic. These antennas will broadcast an extra layer of wireless radio frequency radiation (RFR) — also known as microwave radiation — directly into our homes. The new 5G will also add in higher frequencies — called millimeter waves — which, believe it or not, are the same frequencies that are now used in military crowd control weapons.

    Although 5G was not pre-market tested for safety in terms of health effects on human beings, Verizon and Sprint have announced thirty “test cities” for a 5G rollout. These include Sacramento, Washington DC, Atlanta, Dallas, Miami and New York.

    And indeed, Federal and state legislation is moving forward at a lightning pace to streamline the installation of these cellular towers into neighborhoods by pre-empting local authority, and fast- tracking the process to install antennas  on street lights, utility poles and even mailboxes.

    At the state levels, despite fierce local opposition, over 20 states have passed laws that not only remove public notice and public hearings from the process, but also place a cap on the rates that local governments can charge telecommunications companies for installing these towers on schools, post offices and firehouses.

    At the Federal level, it gets even worse. Federal regulations are stripping away environmental reviews and pre-empting even state authority, making it very difficult for any US community to reject the proposed antennas.

    The telecommunications companies are calling each of these mini cell towers “small cells.” This name is misleading. The new “small cell” cell towers have equipment cabinets the size of refrigerators. These cabinets are referred to by industry as “street furniture”, as if each tower was a sofa in your living room. Rather, each installation can have over a thousand antennas that are transmitting simultaneously — in a process which is called “phased arrays.”

    Recently, more than two hundred and forty scientists and doctors from 41 nations, all of whom who have published peer-reviewed research on electromagnetic radiation or on 5G health hazards, have appealed to the United Nations, calling for urgent action to reduce these ever-growing wireless exposures. Their letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) asks for a moratorium on the roll-out of 5G, citing serious impacts to human health and to the environment. Subsequently, scientists also launched an international appeal to halt 5G as, they argued, current wireless technologies are “proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”

    What are the health effects? It would not be surprising if you were unaware of some of them, since telecommunications companies are major advertisers in mainstream news outlets and are powerful lobbyists with both parties on the Hill.

    Peer-reviewed research has demonstrated a multitude of adverse effects of electromagnetic radiation. These effects include:  increased rates of brain cancer, DNA breaksheadaches, heightened immune system dysfunction, altered brain development, disrupted sleep, higher rates of hyperactivity, and finally, greater numbers of problems with memory and cognition. Replicated research has found wireless radiation can even promote cancer growth.

    Perhaps most concerning is a 2016 review in “Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine” which found that 93% of research studies which investigated oxidative stress, found that wireless exposure induced oxidative stress levels. Induction of oxidative stress is a key characteristicof many human carcinogens. Oxidative stress can lead to a cascade of harmful effects in the body, initiating a myriad of illnesses ranging from cancer to autoimmune problems.

    Believe it or not, no US Federal health agency – not the EPA, FDA, nor the CDC –  has done a proper systematic review of the current scientific research on wireless nor on the newest technology, 5G, to assess its public health impacts. Our so-called “safety limits” are based on 30- year-old science. The EPA was defunded on the issue, and the agency now states that US radiation limits “do not apply” to long term daily exposures to 5G. In other words, there is no effective oversight over the health effects from telecom radiation in the US.

    No one is watching the store.

    Many international medical organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Vienna Medical Association, and more than 20 nations, including FranceIsraelRussiaand Belgium, recommend reducing cell phone radiation exposure, especially for children. Several countries such Chile and Greece have regulations that consider schools, hospitals and parks to be “sensitive areas” and do not allow cell towers to be built on these areas.

    In contrast, although the Los Angeles School district has banned cell towers from its school properties, most US schools, hospitals, police stations, post offices and parks remained unprotected.


    Read the full article here





NSA Intelligence Analyst Addresses New York Times Schizophrenic Coverage of Energy Weapons

Smart Grid technology is violating these codes by allowing the pulsed microwaves in the form of  sonic noise pollution, dirty electricity and non thermal radiation riding on the power lines into every home and public place where the Smart Grid technology is turned on……Sandaura

  • 10 US Code §950t (2) which forbids attacking non-combatant civilians with weapons of war;
  • 18 USC §2441 which prohibits the Federal governments and agents thereof from committing acts of war upon unarmed, non-combatant civilians;
  • 42 USC 1985 – which prohibits conspiracy to interfere with civil rights;
  • 18 US Code (sections) §241 and §242, which prohibits conspiracy to deprive anyone of their Constitutional Rights.


NSA Intelligence Analyst Addresses New York Times Schizophrenic Coverage of Energy Weapons

By Karen Melton Stewart

This is an open letter to the media, but especially the New York Times.  I will be addressing your schizophrenic coverage of two issues you pretend are not related but are indeed intimately related.

First issue:  In the summer of 2017 the media went crazy covering the assaults upon Diplomatic personnel in Cuba by what many surmised were weapons of a sonic nature.  Diplomats and their families were evacuated back to the states where many were diagnosed with actual concussive brain damage from the seemingly auditory assaults, despite no exterior skull damage. Science News, on 29 August 2018, ran a preview of a paper written for the September 15 issue of Neural Computation, in which Beatrice Golomb MD, PhD., a professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, says that “publicly reported symptoms and experiences of a ‘mystery illness’ afflicting American and Canadian diplomats in Cuba and China strongly match known affects of pulsed radio frequency/microwave electromagnetic (RF/ME) radiation.”

According to a New York Times report on 5 September 2018, Douglas H. Smith, Director of Center for Brain Injury and Repair, and Professor of Neurosurgery at the Perelman Center at the University of Pennsylvania became familiar with these injuries after tending to affected diplomatic personnel and assessed them as more likely microwave weapon attacks victims than sonic. The Federal government for the most part, played dumb, despite the Cold War attacks on the US Embassy in Moscow by the Soviets using microwave weapons from the 1950s to the 1970s and at least one relatively recent incident of an NSA agent named Mike Beck coming down with highly unusual, early on-set Parkinson’s disease after an apparent microwave attack on him and a partner simultaneously in a hostile foreign country in the 1990s, and who also developed early on-set Parkinson’s and has already succumbed to it. Beck is being denied disability because NSA will not admit they know about microwave weapons (and perhaps use them against the strictures of Geneva Convention?)

With these recent revelations, Dr. Ed Spencer, a graduate of Stanford University, Yale Medical School, and Neurology Residency at The University of California, San Francisco, and who practiced general neurology in Sonoma County until his retirement in 2010, but who is still very active with the International Center Against Abuse of Covert Technologies (ICAAT), penned a letter to his colleagues in neurology and neurosurgery featured on the StopTheCrime dot net site, that he has “only recently become aware of an enormous deficit in our neurology education. This is the massive amount of information on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on brain function.  During the last ten years of my practice I have seen a number of patients with symptoms they attributed to remote electronic attacks, and I have been perplexed. Frequently these patients are labeled ‘crazy’ as there is no physical evidence to support their allegations. Now, after reviewing the information available on the sites listed below, it appears that we are dealing with a vast weapons program hidden in secrecy, and that U.S. Citizens have been used as nonconsensual experimental subjects.” And he adds “Without having some knowledge of such technologies, the neurologist is clearly hobbled in effectively practicing neurology, the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric problems exceedingly difficult, and in some cases, almost impossible.”

Contrast the above medical opinions proffered in regard to the 2017 Cuba “sonic” incidents (really microwave weapons attacks), with an attempt that was made a few weeks after it was reported, by an “expert”, a medical sociologist from the James Cook University at Queensland, Australia, to dismiss the incident as “mass delusion”, as reported on 3 July 2018 by MailOnLine reporter Phoebe Weston, which I suspect many in the public did not believe at that point.  I imagine it did take a long time to find any self-respecting professional to parrot such desperate intelligence community drivel in a feeble attempt to put the genie back into the bottle. The so-called mystery attacks revealed publicly the now indisputable existence of a terrifying technology the public by and large had no idea existed, being kept secret by the military, intelligence communities, military industrial complex (MIC), contractors, and the scientists involved, although such weapons under the moniker of Directed Energy Weapons in reality have been under development in earnest for 60 or so years in an electronic arms race no one can ultimately win for losing.

Watered-down versions of these weapons are being rolled out to our now post-9/11 militarized police as “non-lethal weapons”, though they were always designed to be lethal, according to retired military security specialist P. David Gaubatz, in Virginia. His job entailed guarding the testing of these weapons on animals. After watching a particularly misleading 60 Minutes episode years ago, wherein the high-ranking military officer being interviewed touted the non-lethal nature of these electronic weapons (tested on presumably young, healthy males only), Gaubatz tried to warn the public and set the record straight by getting in touch with a program producer to clarify that the weapons were always designed and intended to be lethal, but were merely being used at a lower power to garner the questionable non-lethal designation. He recounted that truckloads of animals were brought into test facilities after dark and truckloads of carcasses were removed pre-dawn, victims of horrific deaths by variations of Directed Energy Weapons at full strength. Microwave of course sucks every bit of moisture out of your body, with an accompanying high-pitched tell-tale whine, if your hearing is good enough to notice it.  It must be an excruciating way to die. You may even remember reports coming out from unofficial sources regarding the fierce Battle for the Fallujah Airport in Iraq where Iraqi citizens and soldiers reported Iraqi soldiers rendered into dried out bags of bones and teeth by some weapon unfamiliar to them, silent, long-ranged, and impossible to defend against.  The bodies plus two inches of top soil were reportedly taken by the Americans to an unknown location in the desert and disposed of.  (See the YouTube video “Star Wars in Iraq 2003” by Maurizio Torrealta and Sigfrido Ranucci.) Would the topsoil have revealed radiological contamination? We’ll never know. But that was not the only unconventional weapon rolled out in Iraq. Something else called “The Voice of God” weapon was used on the Iraqi soldiers to make them believe that Allah himself was telling them to put down their weapons and surrender. This is also called “Voice to Skull” aka V2K – sound that is sent along a radio frequency microwave that can actually put that sound, even the spoken word, into someone’s head. President Putin of Russia has even been reported as saying that the Russians attempted to use this technology (a neuro-electronic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull of a person, by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation) during the Cold War, to securely communicate with their agents, but “we had to stop because we found it was giving our own agents brain damage”.

In an article in the Houston Chronicle on 13 September 2006 by L. Baldor, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne was quoted as saying, “Non-lethal weapons such as high-powered microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before they are used on the battlefield”. Then the article describes how non-lethals should weaken people not injure them, and the deleterious affects on nearby electronics are also mentioned (I call it the canary in the coal mine affect).

So, we know now as a nation, that these weapons exist. That horse has definitively left the barn with the Cuba story, followed by similar revelations even more recently from our diplomats in China. This is not science fiction nor “mass delusion”. We know that the weapons manufacturers and their military customers require testing on human subjects to prove efficacy and sell lucrative contracts.  But have they already been doing such testing on human beings, albeit covertly and decidedly non-consensually? Are they indeed torturing, injuring and killing innocent people (and animals)? And by what legalistic sleight of hand are they doing it, since that would clearly violate these US Codes and more:

  • 10 US Code §950t (2) which forbids attacking non-combatant civilians with weapons of war;
  • 18 USC §2441 which prohibits the Federal governments and agents thereof from committing acts of war upon unarmed, non-combatant civilians;
  • 42 USC 1985 – which prohibits conspiracy to interfere with civil rights;
  • 18 US Code (sections) §241 and §242, which prohibits conspiracy to deprive anyone of their Constitutional Rights.

Herein we come to the second issue I wish to address, where we begin to see the media and governmental schizophrenia in regard to a decades-long and growing phenomenon called “Targeted Individuals”.  These are people who report that they suddenly find themselves under what would appear to be electronic assault by so-called “invisible weapons”, from strangers using devices from nearby homes, apartments, cars, backpacks, or handheld devices, often trained on them at a strength of low to medium-high, or worse, 24/7, often accompanied by a painfully high-pitched whine. In desperation to protect themselves and lessen the unthinkable pain and discomfort of being cooked alive slowly (which often induces death by catastrophic organ failure, heart attack, stroke, cancer, singed or liquefied internal organs, desiccation, etc.) they often grab the easiest potentially protective material – tinfoil. Hence the reference to “tinfoil hat club” as what society has come to accept as “conspiracy theory”, i.e. people  “imagining” something nebulous is attacking them. Nothing to see here, no need to listen and investigate, or think. (The CIA is credited with introducing this concept into society to cover up a host of ills done to us.) Soon the “lucky ones” through diligence and desperation, discover that copper sheets, malleable silicon, and Teflon mitigate or deflect many more types of energy weapons directed at them than aluminum foil.

This phenomenon of so-called mass paranoia where people of all ages, ethnicities, vocations, educations, religious beliefs, backgrounds, locations, etc. “just happened” to believe exactly the same thing was happening to them down to the smallest detail, was even covered in the New York Times in 2016 by a quasi-journalist named McPhate, in a piece of yellow journalism called “They See Gang Stalkers”.  He interviewed people who reported being non-consensual targets of such energy weapons on less than lethal full strength, but certainly horrifically more than “crowd control level”, though also victims of contracted stalking, a technique used first and foremost as a psychological operation against the individual chosen to be sacrificed for the greater good (MIC profit margins) in order to make their complaints about being hit with invisible electronic weapons sound just as paranoid as claiming large numbers of strangers were relay-stalking them for no known reason.


Port Hardy resident furious over smart meter installation

SUBMITTED PHOTO A BC Hydro contracted company employee enters Al Dodd’s garage on Sept. 5 and installs a smart meter against his wishes.

Port Hardy resident furious over smart meter installation

“They came into my house without consent and it wasn’t even a BC Hydro employee.”

Al Dodd is livid that BC Hydro went on his property without permission and installed a smart meter against his wishes.

Dodd, who lives on Daphne Street in Port Hardy and has been firmly against having a smart meter placed in his house for years now, stated he was away on vacation in Panama when a company contracted by BC Hydro entered his garage.

“I received no notification and it was not with my consent that they entered my house,” said Dodd, who added he had three signs posted, one on the door and two inside his garage, that said not to install a smart meter.

He added he did not see this coming, as “A long time ago I talked to them (BC Hydro) on the phone and they said as long as you pay your legacy meter fees (they wouldn’t put in a smart meter).”

His neighbour snapped photos of the contracted company going into his garage on Sept. 5, because his neighbour felt it was “kind of fishy — I’m thinking maybe they knew I was away, but I have no answers to that,” added Dodd.

He noted the smart meter is located directly under his bedroom, and he stated he thinks they are dangerous because they can potentially start fires. “I come from a firefighter family and no smoke detector in the garage is going to wake me up,” he said, adding he will be contacting the Port Hardy RCMP, his lawyer, and a friend of his who is a former Telus employee that is an advocate against smart meters.

“They had no right to do this,” he said. “I’ve paid my fees, I’ve paid my dues, and it’s not only a safety concern — they came into my house without consent and it wasn’t even a BC Hydro employee.”

When asked if he thinks his hydro bill will change now that he has a smart meter installed, Dodd replied, “I know it will,” stating he feels his bill is most likely going to triple now.

When asked to comment, Ted Olynyk, Manager for Community Relations Vancouver Island for BC Hydro, stated the company changes legacy meters out regularly, and all meters are regulated by Measurement Canada to ensure accuracy for the consumer.

“We have about 10,000 meters across the province that will need to be exchanged,” said Olynyk. “New meters will be put in place because we do not use legacy meters anymore. Customers do have the option when we install the new meter to have the radio off so it won’t communicate like a smart meter does.”

As for whether they are allowed to go on customer’s property without their consent, Olynyk said that “As part of the agreement with our customers, we require access to the meter. We have to read it and we have to take the old meters out, because if we don’t then we would be in violation of Measurement Canada and we would face a fine.”

He noted fines from Measurement Canada are typically in the thousands of dollars, and that if customers want power, “you need a meter with the new equipment we are using, which you do have the option to have the radio off.”

Olynyk also said there is no truth to smart meters starting fires. “We’ve actually found it’s an improvement for safety — there have been less fires after changing out the old meters because we are able to go in and clean up things like faulty wiring from the past.”


California city blocks 5G deployments


California city blocks 5G deployments

From TechCrunch.com:

Bay Area California city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns

Danny Crichton@dannycrich

The Bay Area may be the center of the global technology industry, but that hasn’t stopped one wealthy enclave from protecting itself from the future.

The city council of Mill Valley, a small town located just a few miles north of San Francisco, voted unanimously late last week to effectively block deployments of small-cell 5G wireless towers in the city’s residential areas.

Through an urgency ordinance, which allows the city council to immediately enact regulations that affect the health and safety of the community, the restrictions and prohibitions will be put into force immediately for all future applications to site 5G telecommunications equipment in the city. Applications for commercial districts are permitted under the passed ordinance.

The ordinance was driven by community concerns over the health effects of 5G wireless antennas. According to the city, it received 145 pieces of correspondence from citizens voicing opposition to the technology, compared to just five letters in support of it — a ratio of 29 to 1. While that may not sound like much, the city’s population is roughly 14,000, indicating that about 1% of the population had voiced an opinion on the matter.
Blocks on 5G deployments are nothing new for Marin County, where other cities including San Anselmo and Ross have passed similar ordinances designed to thwart 5G expansion efforts over health concerns.

These restrictions on small cell site deployments could complicate 5G’s upcoming nationwide rollout. While 5G standards have yet to be standardized, one model that has broad traction in the telecommunications industry is to use so-called “small cell” antennas to increase bandwidth and connection quality while reducing infrastructure and power costs. Smaller antennas are easier to install and will be loss obtrusive, reducing the concerns of urban preservationists to unsightly tower masts that have long plagued the deployment of 4G antennas in communities across the United States.

Perhaps most importantly, these small cells emit less radiation, since they are not designed to provide as wide of coverage as traditional cell sites. The telecom industry has long vociferously denied a link between antennas and health outcomes, although California’s Department of Public Health has issued warnings about potential health effects of personal cell phone antennas. Reduced radiation emissions from 5G antennas compared to 4G antennas would presumably further reduce any health effects of this technology.

Restrictions like Mill Valley’s will make it nearly impossible to deploy 5G in a timely manner. As one industry representative told me in an interview a few months ago, “It takes 18 months to get the permit to deploy, and 2 hours to install.” Multiplied by the hundreds of sites required to cover a reasonably-sized urban neighborhood, and the 5G rollout goes beyond daunting to well-near impossible.

While health concerns have bubbled in various municipalities, those concerns are not shared globally. China, through companies like Huawei, is investing billions of dollars to design and build 5G infrastructure, in hopes of stealing the industry crown from the United States, which is the market leader in 4G technologies.

Those competitive concerns have increasingly been a priority at the FCC, where chairman Ajit Pai and his fellow Republican commissioners have pushed hard to overcome local concerns around health and historical preservation. The commission voted earlier this year on new siting rules that would accelerate 5G adoption.
Mill Valley’s ordinance is designed to frustrate those efforts, while remaining within the letter of federal law, which preempts local ordinances. Mill Valley’s mayor has said that the city will look to create a final ordinance over the next year.

See it here https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/10/bay-area-city-blocks-5g-deployments-over-cancer-concerns/




So, EWEB plans to start rolling out smart meters in the fall. Wow! Really?!?

This, even in the light of strong evidence that the microwave radiation they emit can cause significant health problems. No, there currently aren’t consistent findings of the adverse health effects.

Interesting, don’t you think, that industry funded testing tends to show no harm, while independent testing tends to show harm. Sound familiar? Think back to industry vs. independent testing of cigarette smoking. Hmm… At least with cigarettes, I can choose not to smoke. And yes, I can opt out of the smart meter program, but what if my nearby neighbor does not? The radiation does not stop at the property line or my apartment wall.

Why the push for smart meters? Does whatever benefit really outweigh the risk? Why is EWEB, a publicly-owned entity, not being more forthcoming to us, its owners, about possible risks associated? As well as for health, there’s privacy and cybersecurity concerns. Why, on their website, don’t they promote full disclosure to educate us rather than the sales job they’re doing?

I remain stunned, frustrated, and alarmed. Please say ‘no’ to smart meters.

Sarah Wylie, Eugene



Click Below to See Two New Publications
US Scientist Criticizes ICNIRP’s Dismissal of the US National Toxicology Program Study.
Dr. Melnick cites “numerous incorrect and misleading claims”by ICNIRP concluding, “The ‘P’ in ICNIRP stands for Protection. One must wonder who this commission is trying to protect – evidently, it is not public health.”
“The Problem With 5G”
PC Magazine reports technology might be problematic, especially for companies “because people are already concerned that 5G is unsafe before they even get it on a single pole.”
Daily Clout: 5G, Our Health and What We Can Do Now
5G streamlining Bills are stripping away our constitutional rights to health. Read EHT’s opinion piece on industry influence into US regulations and what you can do.
Bay Area City Blocks 5G Deployments Over Cancer Concerns
The city council of Mill Valley voted unanimously to effectively block 5G.
Teacher Union Urges Education on Reducing Radiation
Teachers call for California Health Department advice on lowering cell phone radiation to be shared with students and staff in San Francisco public schools.
Expert James C. Lin Declares “Clear Evidence” of Cell Phone Cancer Association
Top electrical engineering magazine reports on the NTP study that found “clear evidence” of cancer. Professor of electrical engineering and renowned expert Dr. Lin calls to reduce RF limits.
“Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers”
Scientists Allen Frey and Beatrice Golomb are featured in this story -“microwave strikes may have caused sonic delusions and very real brain damage among embassy staff and family members.”
Medical Professor Beatrice Golomb Publishing Analysis of Microwave Sickness in Diplomats
Dr. Golomb’s paper appears in September 15 in Neural Computation advising serious attention to health impacts of microwaves.Read Press Release.
Your Support Makes a Difference.

EXCLUSIVE: Doctors Reveal Details of Neuro-Weapon Attacks in Havana


EXCLUSIVE: Doctors Reveal Details of Neuro-Weapon Attacks in Havana

By Stew Magnuson

Directed energy weapons intended to disrupt or damage their victims’ brains were the most likely source of a series of mysterious attacks singling out U.S. personnel assigned to the U.S. Embassy in Cuba in 2017, three doctors involved in the investigation have told National Defense in exclusive interviews.

The three experts were contacted by the State Department to investigate 25 cases of government employees working in Cuba who complained of suddenly hearing noises, pressure in their ears, followed by symptoms such as headaches, vertigo, dizziness and loss of cognitive functions.

The team of three experts concluded that incident was a widescale use of electronics to carry out a so-called neuro-weapon attack. Neuro-weapons are an emerging, but little understood threat that is compounded by the ease in which they can be purchased on the internet.

“I think we are turning a page,” said Dr. James Giordano, a professor at the departments of neurology and biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center and chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program at the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics. The Pentagon has taken notice of the event and Giordano and the two other team members will be briefing the J3, joint chiefs of staff, on Sept. 7.

Neuro-weapons can take the form of biological agents, chemical weapons — and in the Havana case — directed energy, and possibly a combination of different methods, Giordano said. The effects can be latent, durable, highly disruptive and attribution is difficult. They are not “weapons of mass destruction,” but they have the potential to disrupt everything from individual cells in a body, to societies and geopolitics, said Giordano, who authored a 2014 book, Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns.

The attacks occurred at the victims’ homes, with the exception of two cases that took place in a hotel known to accommodate diplomats and other U.S. personnel, said Dr. Michael Hoffer, director of the Vestibular and Balance Program at the University of Miami’s Department of Otolaryngology. Hoffer was the first physician to examine the victims on site in Cuba, and later in Miami.

“I thought they were being targeted. I still believe they were being targeted,” he said. Those he examined said they were sitting in their homes, or the hotel, when they suddenly felt the symptoms: a loud noise exposure, a pressure sensation, ear pain, then ringing in the ears and dizziness. A day later there were some cognitive deficits reported.

“They would actually say that if they moved in their domicile, the beam — as it were — would follow them. Except the minute they opened the front door, it went off,” Hoffer said.

Hoffer carried out a series of preliminary tests on 100 personnel assigned to the embassy last summer, as well as 10 people who were in the same residences of the victims at the time of the attack, but in other rooms. No symptoms were found in the 100 other employees.

Being in Havana shortly after the attacks and before news had reached the media was important because it gave Hoffer valuable insights, he said. Other than speaking to one another about the symptoms, the victims were not influenced by newspaper accounts. In addition, he arrived relatively soon after the attacks when their memories of what happened were fresh, and none of them had received any medical treatment.

He also had the opportunity to see where the incidents occurred. “I literally looked and walked at the places that were hit,” he said.

Most of the victims also worked in a particular part of the embassy, he added. “They were really good at targeting,” he said of those who carried out the attacks. The homes were clustered in certain neighborhoods where diplomats reside, he added.

“People were hit from all branches of the State Department, but certain branches were hit more than others,” he said.
Thirty-five potential victims — the 25 who reported symptoms plus the 10 who were in the residences at the same time — were flown to Miami where an interdisciplinary team of experts from the University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine carried out a battery of more detailed tests.

Hoffer was able to quickly rule out the possibility that they had experienced a traumatic brain injury, or TBI. As a retired Navy captain and doctor, he had examined more than 3,000 service members who had experienced TBI and that was not it. Plus, none of the victims had reported injuring their head.

The team recorded “objective findings of balance disorders” on 100 percent of the 25 victims, who had reported the symptoms. Everyone was abnormal in at least one balance test. “We made sure they were ‘super’ abnormal not just ‘barely’ abnormal, Hoffer said. The 10 people who were in the same buildings at the time of the attacks showed no symptoms.

The 25 victims also had a unique pattern of cognitive disorders that the co-lead of the team, the university’s director of neuropsychology Dr. Bonnie Levin, picked up, he said.

Giordano said directed energy weapons can cause these injuries by creating “cavitation,” or air pockets, in fluids near the inner ear. The shape of the inner ear amplifies sounds and waveforms to cause the effect. The process creates air bubbles, or cavities, that eventually burst.

Near the inner ear are two pathways carrying blood to the brain — the cochlear aqueduct and the vestibular aqueduct. The bubbles can travel rapidly up the aqueducts into the brain where they can “function as a stroke,” Giordano said.

There were 19 complete sets of data derived from the 25 victims after the University of Miami team completed the tests. The State Department put Hoffer together in a team with Giordano and Dr. Carey Balaban, a professor of otolaryngology, bioengineering, neurobiology and communication and science disorders, at the University of Pittsburgh.

The three independently examined all the data using different approaches, but came to the same conclusions. They ruled out TBI because the damage was not consistent with such injuries. Toxins such as heavy metals or high doses of certain medications that cause similar inner ear problems were not present, and the damage not consistent.

Balaban, who works with the Office of Naval Research, was familiar with a body of scientific research, mostly conducted by ONR from the early 1960s to the late 1980s, on directed energy weapons and their effects on the inner ear. The research sought to identify the human head’s susceptibility to directed energy exposures. The papers helped form part of his conclusions.

“The likelihood of multiple sources of energy of acoustic and radio frequencies … is there, we just don’t know what it was,” he said.

The team could not conclude exactly what method the perpetrators used on the victims, but narrowed it down to several possibilities: drugs alone was deemed “unlikely.” Ultrasonic (acoustic) exposures they judged “very possible and likely.” Electromagnetic pulsing was also rated “very possible and probable.” Microwave energy was deemed possible, but “unlikely.”

There was another possibility — but more information was needed to know — that the attackers used a combination of a drug that was activated by the directed energy weapon.

Balaban said there was another possible method: pulsed lasers. “Near infrared lasers penetrate pretty far into the head,” he said. “All of these weapons can produce cavitation in fluids and can produce these effects,” he added. The three team members agreed that “saying [the Cuba attacks] are one thing or another is foolhardy,” Balaban said.

“Can we know who did it? I’m not quite sure. Do we know what they were exposed to? Hard to tell. But it points out this [knowledge] gap that we need to fill,” Balaban said.

The case has drawn a great deal of attention within the Pentagon and at Special Operations Command, he said. The information was recently declassified and the three have given briefings to SOCOM and to the Air Force’s AFWERX. Balaban is working on a grant with ONR to reproduce the attack in a laboratory setting so it can be better understood.

The trio plans to publish a paper as soon as possible with the results for all to see. One theory is that the victims were being used as a test — basically human guinea pigs — and the perpetrators are hoping the U.S. publishes test results that can help them fine-tune or better understand how to use these weapons. Balaban said that kind of data will not be made public.

Meanwhile, “Pandora’s box is open as far as making these kinds of things,” Balaban said. Devices that can be used in ultrasonic attacks, for example, are readily available on the internet for less than $300. The off-the-shelf devices are intended to repulse vermin such as rats and insects and have a range of about 30 to 40 feet, he said.

“We are facing a threat. And an important thing is to figure out the battlespace we are dealing with here and make some solutions,” Balaban said. “It’s the perfect kind of gray warfare. It’s a very good way to degrade your opponent’s capabilities so you can exploit it with conventional means.”

Such weapons could be used clandestinely against a political leader, for example, to ultimately destabilize a society, Giordano said. “I think what you are beginning to see is a greater likelihood for targeting the brain in these ways — both in regard to its structure and its functions, which includes cognitions, emotions and behaviors — in ways that are going to be disruptive on a variety of scales from systems in the individual to systems in the social and political” realm, he said.

Balaban added: “We have a plausible set of vulnerabilities — areas we know nothing about, neuro-weapons, that have been used asymmetrically. We have to figure out what the heck this is.”

For more on the potential of neuro-weapons, see the article by James Giordano, “Weaponizing The Brain: Neuroscience Advancements Spark Debate” in the May 2017 issue of National Defense

Topics: CBRNWeapons of Mass DestructionEmerging Technologies


Electricity Isn’t Sexy Unless Illness and Misery Turn You On

Electricity Isn’t Sexy Unless Illness and Misery Turn You On

By B.N. Frank

The bad news is that Dirty Electricity is almost everywhere and research has proven over and over again that it is harmful.  The good news is that with some knowledge and effort, we can make some consumer choices in order to reduce our exposure and feel better.

So what exactly is Dirty Electricity?  According to ElectricalPollution.com

Clean power enters the home at 60 Hz. Electrical pollution is 60 Hz electricity polluted with high frequency signals or “dirty” power flowing on the wires and through the earth.

Dirty Electricity can cause or worsen individual illnesses.  It can also cause clusters of illnesses within buildings and communities.  Dr. Sam Milham has been researching it for so many years that he wrote a book about it simply titled, Dirty Electricity.


In the video below, Dr. Milham explains how Dirty Electricity is easy to detect using an AM radio.  Others have used this method as well (see 2nd video).  Certified Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist, Eric Windheim, demonstrates using professional measuring tools in the 3rd video below.

See all videos at:   https://www.activistpost.com/2018/09/dirty-electricity-illness-misery.html


Electronic devices in schools hurt learning — and health

(Jason Alden/Bloomberg News)

I agree with Brooke Olsen Romney’s Sept. 1 op-ed, “U.S. students need a cellphone detox.” School administrators are not doing their job and are leaving teachers in an impossible situation.

Districts such as Montgomery County Public Schools invite devices into the classroom. I am among many parents who believe that excessive screen use in the classroom has a negative impact on health and learning because of the distraction of the screens and the radiation the devices emit.

In Maryland, the state-appointed Children’s Environmental Health and Protection Advisory Council has recommended reducing classroom exposure to wireless radiation (through wired Internet connections or turning wireless radiation off when not in use), yet school districts, including Montgomery County Public Schools, refuse. According to a recent Consumer Reports article, David Carpenter, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the State University of New York at Albany, “says that while exposure from a single router in your home may be small, the risks could be greater in places that have dozens of laptops and routers working at the same time — such as school classrooms.” Jerry Phillips, a professor of biochemistry at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, has studied the potential biologic effects of cellphone radiation and “notes that children’s developing bodies may be more vulnerable to all forms of radiation from devices.”

Our children’s health must be a priority; there are no do-overs in that regard. Let’s not waste another year and take unnecessary risks with students’ health.

Laura Simon, Potomac


Antenna Sickness Is Everywhere Now

Antenna Sickness Is Everywhere Now

 Antenna Sickness Is Everywhere Now

Educator Camilla Rees, MBA, discussing her project to measure ambient microwave radiation for clients in New York City, 2016: 

“I went to measure the apartment on the first floor there and the man had throat cancer and as I got towards the corner bedroom, the levels [of audible radiation] kept getting higher and higher….We found out it was coming from outside and it was one block diagonally across the street with an antenna farm on a five-story group of buildings that was beaming directly into this area. And it dawned on all of us what this man was dealing with. And they told me that [of] eight out of the nine apartments, in the corner bedrooms they had cancer and the ninth one had three miscarriages.” [1]

Bio-Initiative Report 2012 (2014): 

“Bioeffects are clearly established and occur at very low levels of exposure to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation. Bioeffects can occur in the first few minutes at levels associated with cell and cordless phone use.  Bioeffects can also occur from just minutes of exposure to mobile phone masts [cell towers], Wi-Fi and wireless utility “smart” meters that produce whole body exposure. Chronic base station [cell tower] exposures can result in illness.” [2]

EUROPAEM 2015 Guideline for Prevention and Treatment of Wireless Radiation Illnesses: 

“Analysis of the data available on the exposure of people living near mobile phone base stations has yielded clear indications of adverse health effects like fatigue, depression, difficulty in concentrating, headaches, dizziness, etc.” [3]

 Antenna Sickness Is Everywhere Now

Mobile communications and mobile entertainment require a human environment overflowing with disease-inducingradiation, both indoors and out.  Above is a photo of the Stockholm Central Railway Station in Sweden. A 2016 study ofthe man-made wave pollution within this facility was conducted by the Hardell Cancer Research Group in Sweden. [4] This study is a reality check on the astronomical number of RF/microwave frequencies and modulations which simultaneously bombard our bodies everywhere we go.

Twenty different pulsed frequency sets were found within this cavernous facility.  Investigators used professional RF analyzers to identify FM radio at 87 megahertz and three different police radio bands (TETRA) propagating at 380 to 470 megahertz.  The 4G/LTE signals range from 791 megahertz to 2.7 gigahertz. GSM signals span 880 megahertz to 1.8 gigahertz. Wi-Fi signals range from 2.45 gigahertz to 5.9 gigahertz. UMTS/3G frequencies span 1.9 gigahertz to 2.2 gigahertz. There is also WiMAX at 3.3-3.9 gigahertz. This pollution is measured as high-frequency electromagneticvoltage, which literally charges the air with powerful electron activity. Ions and molecules are greatly affected. This pollution oscillates the polarity of human cells (negative-positive) millions to billions of times per second, a situation that does not occur in nature. This pollution is the VOLTAGE OF CANCER.

The wave carcinogen in Stockholm Central is delivered through numerous frequency channels for both uplink (radiation from mobile devices) and downlink (radiation from fixed antennas). Each of these biologically-active frequencies slams living flesh with its own peculiar modulation pulses. A human body in this environment becomes a breathing antenna for a multitude of strange electromagnetic vibrations that are alien to all natural biological rhythms. These electromagnetic manipulations are widely-documented to rearrange human genetic material.  As with the United States and Western Europe, Swedish cancer rates continue to rise exponentially. Young Swedish women, especially, are now suffering a striking increase in the variety of thyroid cancer linked to radiation exposure. [5]

Many published studies confirm the carcinogenicity of Wi-radiation but each study focuses on the biological exposure of only a single frequency!

No published scientific study yet has explored the aggregate biological effects of the complex, multi-frequency radiation that now pollutes inhabited buildings and the general environment everywhere across the globe.

The oncologists who completed the Stockholm study represent four Swedish medical institutions. These researchers include in their report the latest scientific evidence of sickness and cancers associated with the wireless radiation measured at Stockholm Central. They confirm that many negative biological consequences, for both people and animals, are induced by far lower power density levels than those found within the complex. They stress the urgency of officially designating the invasive wireless radiation in Stockholm Central as a CONFIRMED HUMAN CARCINOGEN, thereby recognizing this pollution on par with asbestos and nuclear radiation. And they warn that “it is imperative to measure the public’s exposure” in order to accommodate future epidemiological studies of the wireless carnage we all suffer today.


The late Robert C. Kane, Ph.D., whose career included electrical engineering for Motorola, advised: “The belief that microwaves cannot cause bond breaking in chromosomes or DNA, or damage tissue more generally is quite inaccurate. Since the energy absorption mechanism is not the same as that for ionizing radiation, such as X-rays, the mechanisms of energy transfer that cause the bond breaking may be different. However the result is quite evident–DNA and chromosomal damage…. It’s not just happening at one frequency and it’s not just being observed by researchers in one laboratory. The same chromosome and DNA damages are being reported at frequencies across the entire range, including 100 MHz [FM radio], 300 MHz, 837 MHz, 954 MHz [cell phones] 1,250 MHz, 2,450 MHz [2.45 gigahertz: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, smart phones], and up to 9000 MHz  [9 gigahertz: vehicle-to-vehicle radar systems].” [6]

The wireless antenna signals bombarding Stockholm Central are the same as those which befoul public buildings, sports arenas, schools, medical centers, cities, towns and neighborhoods of the USA and Canada. A foremost European expert in radio engineering confirms the incredible complexity of this ubiquitous electrosmog:

“There are now about 20 modulation systems in widespread common use, plus about 50 or more specialist ones.”

Regarding the manipulation of radio signals to increase data speed and accommodate millions of eager Wi-users, he says:

“Phase modulation is a relatively new technique…that allows far more data to be encoded onto an RF carrier (microwave signal)….Instead of a nice smooth sine wave, the RF carrier repeatedly jumps from one part of the sine wave to a different part as it encodes the data. This produces a lot of VERY fast, sharp “edges” and a lot of “aggressive” low frequency noise (10-HZ to 100 kilohertz)  or even faster.” [7]

The following two charts illustrate the typical wave forms of pulsed wireless signals which blast through our bodies everywhere we go. The wave form shown in the top chart is indicative of the older 2G technology of GSM/TDMA. The second chart below shows the wave form of the more complex 3G signal of UMTS propagated with CDMA modulation. A 2016 paper signed by six radiation experts, states that the risk to humans for glioma brain cancer is OVER THREE TIMES HIGHER from exposure to the more complex 3G UMTS signals shown in chart two, than from the less complex 2G signals shown in chart one. They also state that the 3G signals may be more effective at preventing the repair of broken DNA. [8]  This matters because broken and unrepaired DNA is the bedrock of human cancers.

Now take a look below at the ultra-complex wave form of the newer 4G radiation, propagated from personal smart devices and from the newest neighborhood antennas.  It is obvious that 4G wave patterns of LTE and WiMax, delivered in multiple data streams (MIMO), are immeasurably more data-dense and complex in pulse structure than 2G and 3G.Scientists have had neither time nor money to investigate how the newer 4G signals may increase human cancer risks.  So we must use our common sense.

Meantime, the modulations and wave forms of upcoming 5G millimeter wave signals are still being formulated as the Wireless Radiation Industry revs its brute engines of “innovation.”

In 2015, three renowned scientists cooperated to publish a paper which explains why the violently erratic wave radiation seen in the charts above is so catastrophic for humans, who generate their own natural electromagnetic wave forms for regulation of biological functions. Annotated with 103 medical citations, this report notes that all living organisms perceive Wi-radiation as a potent environmental stressor, for which evolution has provided no adequate defense. The authors reference copious medical evidence showing that it is the perpetual change in frequencies and pulse modulations which stress living cells the most.  They say that modulated radiation used for wireless technologies is actually more biologically stressful than excessive heat, cold, starvation and toxic chemicals. Living cells produce heat-shock proteins within minutes of exposure to RF/microwave assault. Heat shock proteins cascade into free radical formation, followed by drastic DNA damage, which precedes the development of cancer. [9]

The latest science confirms that modulated, data-bearing RF/microwave signals deliver brutal micro-shocks to the DNA within living cells. The European REFLEX studies of 2004 clearly demonstrated that a mere 24-hour exposure to the 1.8 gigahertz (GHz), one of the lethal frequencies flowing through Stockholm Central, inflicts the same catastrophic damage to human DNA as 1600 chest X-rays. [10] Many other recent studies confirm that microwaves across the megahertz and gigahertz spectrum effectively ravage the genetic material in human cells. Dr. Henry Lai, whose research at the University of Washington produced some of these studies, confirms: “….Critical genetic mutations in one single cell are sufficient to lead to cancer.” [11]  The wireless frequencies found within Stockholm Central, as well as within most public and private buildings across the USA, have potential to inflict gross genetic mutations, ironic in light of America’s frantic campaign to “cure” cancer and halt autism.

There is also the dirty electricity factor.  Dr. Sam Milham is an expert on the devastating health effects (including diabetes and cancer) of stray impulse and oscillatory transients, which carry erratic spikes of voltage into electrical systems.  Dr. Milham explains: “Don’t forget that every cell tower has an inverter or switching power supply to change the grid AC to DC to run the microwave transmitter and to charge the backup batteries. These generate dirty electricity [kilohertz pollution] which flows back into the grid.” [12]

The RF/microwave pollution from cell tower antennas sited close to electrical generation stations and power lines can couple with and flow through the transmission lines, even in some cases creating dangerous standing RF waves along those transmission lines. UK radiation expert Alasdair Philips says: “Radiation from masts [like the microwave tower seenbehind this electrical substation] can resonate with house wiring, causing high fields inside houses, often from lights which hang from the ceilings, the radio frequencies running down the electric flex. If this is the case in a house, there may be high frequency fields inside, even though there are no direct sources of radiofrequency emissions from household appliances or systems.” [13] Often the highest microwave readings in a Wi-polluted house can be found at the electrical outlets. This is why broadband over power lines (BOP) is such a dangerous technology.  This is why microwave antennas mounted on power poles are such a bad idea.

The photographer who took the urban photo above carried a variety of electromagnetic radiation meters. On the residential sidewalk where he stood, the wildly fluctuating microwave voltage exceeded the upper limit of his RF instrument (6 volts per meter). The low-frequency voltage reading also exceeded his instrument limit of 100 milligauss. Wherever there is electrical voltage there are also powerful and erratic magnetic fields.  These high readings within a residential area far exceed the power densities associated with severe fatigue and illness, including dementia and childhood leukemia. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) confirms that both the high and low frequencies raging through this site have potential to generate cancer in humans. [14] In 2016, scientists in Switzerland compiled complex studies of genes and molecular pathways to confirm once again that there are many plausible linkages between these powerful EMF fields and severe human disease. [15]  But no one yet knows exactly how the potential for disaster is amplified in a combo situation like this, where people live and work for years in buildings invaded by a ferocious, multi-frequency electromagnetic storm.

In addition, airborne particle pollution from the heavy traffic flowing through this site, can form a deadly “corona” of split ions around high tension electric power lines.  Electrically-charged pollutant aerosols become “sticky,” and when inhaled, they have a much higher probability of embedding deeply within the lungs. [16] No studies have yet been published on the enhanced toxicity of particle pollution electromagnetically charged by the millions of RF/microwave antennas in our midst.

 Slow Kill: How Antenna Sickness Unfolds

Despite the prolific science of harm,  the Wireless Industry has one major goal above all others: to increase and enhance microwave irradiation of the human environment. Therefore, the US environment becomes more deadly by the day as Wi-profiteers continue to affix new small cell antennas on buildings, lamp posts, electric poles, street furniture, bus stops, etc.  Mobile providers simply can’t hang ’em fast enough in order to fill the so-called “dead zones” between the large macro towers.  Verizon, the number one US wireless provider, is rapidly “densifying” outdoor urban areas with a new generation of 4G small cell “nodes” as it simultaneously accelerates its 5G experiments. “Densification is important because people like to use their smart phones,” explains Verizon. [17] The fact that non-smart phone users would like to live past infancy –and feel well– is immaterial in the Microwave age. Verizon is also unleashing Ericsson’s indoor Radio Dot antenna systems for commercial USA, apparently with no liability whatever for the illness and disability which this powerful, in-your-face 4G/LTE radiation may inflict upon people trapped within antenna-festooned buildings. [18]

Nearly every person in the USA is now Wi-irradiated 24/7. So we need to know what ultimately becomes of a population trapped, without their fully-informed consent, in a carcinogenic wasteland.  In 1996, Professor Dr. Karl Hecht and his associate Hans-Ullrich Balzer were commissioned by the German Federal Institute for Telecommunications to conduct research on a massive collection of Soviet Russian technical literature ((1960-1996) documenting the health-damaging effects of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation. In 1997, Hecht and Balzer turned over to their sponsor report based on 878 scientific works. The data was reportedly “disappeared” into a German  archive. [19]

According to Professor Hecht, this massive scientific collection confirms that the duration of microwave irradiation is a foremost decisive factor in human health effects: the longer the exposure, the more deadly the cumulative effects.Therefore, the multi-millions of always-on cellular and Wi-Fi antennas littering the USA are a very dangerous experiment.Russian research showed that there are three consecutive phases involved in the slow, but steady downward spiral of human populations chronically irradiated by radio/microwave antennas, including radar. [20] Every system in the body is eventually affected, including eyesight, hearing and cognitive function. Since each person’s body is genetically different, and since each person’s exposure is unique, each and every Wi-radiation victim will traverse the following phases in his or her own time. Each will develop uniquely individual symptoms.

Initial Phase: The body tries to compensate for and resist the assault 

The first 1-3 years of irradiation

During the first 1-3 years, a sympathicotonic deflected initial phase is predominantly demonstrated. The definition of sympathicotonia (hypertonia) is increased stress of the sympathetic nervous system and a marked tendency to vascular spasm and abnormal blood pressure.  Therefore, studies should be conducted across the US to determine to what extent cell tower radiation, which now screams through the interior of millions of inhabited buildings, is connected to the suffering of millions of Americans who struggle with dangerous high blood pressure, especially those cases for which no other cause can be found.

The initial phase progresses in three sub-phases:

First Sub-phase: This is the sympathicotonia (hypertonia) activation phase. It is comparable with the alarm phase of the general adaptation syndrome of Selye and with the unspecific activation according to [Lindsley, 1951] [Lacey, 1967] and others. This means that the body launches its resources into high alert status.

Second Sub-phase: This is the performance-promoting, increased sympathicotonic reaction phase. It often features negative emotional activation [Lindsley, 1951] [Selye, 1953] including feelings of stress and/or anxiety rooted in physiological responses to the radiation.

Third Sub-phase: Still part of the resistance phase, the body continues to attempt adaptive balancing, with less sympathicotonic deflection. During this phase, body functions are still mainly in the range of homeostasis, so normal values are usually measured, although latent, intermittently-appearing ailments may already express themselves. People in this phase, who can connect the dots between illness and irradiation and then take steps to mitigate exposure, are the lucky ones. They can often recover their health in a non-radiation environment. Most people, however, don’t understand this connection because wireless pollution escapes their sensory detection. Thus, the majority of people slip into the advanced phases two and three, from which there may be little or no recovery.

Second Phase: The Body Progresses to Pre-Morbid or Early Phases of Chronic Disease

3-5 years of irradiation

During this second phase, chronically irradiated people develop weakly visible, pathological neurasthenic symptomswith vagotonic reaction tendencies. This means overactivity or irritability of the vagus nerve, adversely affecting function of the blood vessels, stomach, and muscles.  It also means that the parasympathetic autonomic system is overactive, while sleep disorders and daytime tiredness are common. Neurasthenic symptoms involve: poor appetite or overeating, insomnia or hypersomnia, low energy and fatigue, low-self esteem, poor concentration, difficulty making decisions and feelings of hopelessness. In its most severe form, this phase may include a chronic disturbance of mood called dysthymia (depressive neurosis) in which a depressive mood accompanies the other physiological features listed here. This might explain why millions of Americans need anti-depressant drugs and illegal narcotics to cope with their radiation-induced depressive symptoms.  By this end of this stage, the systemic damage may be irreversible, even if the radiation exposure ceases.

Third Phase: The Body Degenerates into Exhaustion and Severe Morbidity

5+ years of irradiation

This final degenerative phase produces pronounced neurasthenic symptoms with increasing pathological lapses of the regulation system, sleep disorders, daytime tiredness, and general exhaustion. People who have progressed to this phase suffer a dramatic increase in chronic illnesses and elevated cancer incidence.  After 30+ years of environmental Wi-radiation, America’s chronically-ill population certainly fits this description. A 2016 study by researchers at Emory University confirms that over one half of the US adult population is now chronically ill:  “The health of individuals is increasingly being defined by complexity and multi-morbidity, the co-occurrence of two or more chronic medical conditions.” [21] However, not one in a million would guess that the mortal misery of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and even depressive mental illness, is inextricably connected to years of covert irradiation delivered by crafty Wi-profiteers who have been laughing all the way to their gold-lined vaults.

Yet Americans Really Don’t Care?

In addition to their chronic exposure to ubiquitous environmental radiation, most Americans add exponentially to their personal dosage of wave carcinogen with daily hours of exposure to on-the-body wireless devices. The irony here is, that while the masses eternally clutch and fondle their cancer-induction devices, manufacturers warn in the fine print of manuals to keep these devices some distance away from direct contact with the body.

In 2010, New York reporter Christopher Ketchum wrote an article on cell phone dangers for GQ Magazine. He said: “Perhaps most worrisome, though, are the preliminary results of the multinational Interphone study sponsored by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, in Lyon, France. (Scientists from thirteen countries took part in the study, the United States conspicuously not among them.) Interphone researchers reported in 2008 that after a decade of cell-phone use, the chance of getting a brain tumor—specifically on the side of the head where you use the phone—goes up as much as 40 percent for adults. Interphone researchers in Israel have found that cell phones can cause tumors of the parotid gland [the salivary gland in the cheek], and an independent study in Sweden last year concluded that people who started using a cell phone before the age of 20 were five times as likely to develop a brain tumor. Another Interphone study reported a nearly 300 percent increased risk of acoustic neuroma, a tumor of the acoustic nerve. As more results of the Interphone study trickled out, I called Louis Slesin, who has a doctorate in environmental policy from MIT and in 1980 founded an investigative newsletter called Microwave News.” [22]

What Louis Slesin told Kechum is key to understanding America’s perilous future: ” ‘No one in this country cared,’ Slesin said of the findings. ‘It wasn’t news.’ He suggested that much of the comfort of our modern lives depends on not caring, on refusing to recognize the dangers of microwave radiation. ‘We love our cell phones. The paradigm that there’s no danger here is part of a worldview that had to be put into place,’ he said. ‘Americans are not asking the questions, maybe because they don’t want the answers. So what will it take?’ ” [23]

America’s toxic denial syndrome is demonstrably today in the smart device age. Thus, with the complicity of its radiation victims, the great and powerful Techno-Beast moves ever forward with a whirlwind of new death technologies, while skillfully keeping the masses “stoned” on what behavioral scientists are now calling “digital heroin.” One in three American babies are hooked on Wi-devices before they can talk. America’s 8- to 10 year-olds spend hours per day on digital media while many teens spend 11 hours+ a day with a wireless toys. [24] Dr. Nicholas Kardaras, a leading neuropsychologist and addiction specialist, explains why:

“We now know that those iPads, smart phones and Xboxes are a form of digital drug. Recent brain imaging research is showing that they affect the brain’s frontal cortex–which controls executive functioning–including impulse control–in exactly the same way that cocaine does. Technology is so hyper-arousing that it raises dopamine levels–the feel-good neurotransmitter most involved in the addiction dynamic–as much as sex.” [25]

How widespread is America’s youthful Wi-Addiction?  Dr. Kardaras reports that 64 million American kids between the ages of 2-17 play video games which are shown by scientists to “affect the development of microstructural properties of the brain associated with negative psychological outcomes.”  Dr. Kardaras says:

“Once a kid has crossed the line into true tech addiction, treatment can be very difficult.  Indeed, I have found it easier to treat heroin and crystal meth addicts than lost-in-the-matrix video gamers or Facebook-dependent social media addicts.”

Dr. Kardaras confirms that this deadly addiction has been micro-planned by corporate predators:

“The video game business is a sophisticated, multi-billion dollar industry devoted entirely to creating addictive products aimed at defenseless kids and young people–like shooting fish in a barrel…..’Gaming companies will hire neurobiologists and neuroscientists to hook up electrodes to the test-gamer. If they don’t elicit the blood pressure they shoot for, typically 180 over 120 or 140 within a few minutes of playing, and if they don’t show sweating and and increases in their galvanic skin responses, they go back and tweak the game to get the maximum addicting and arousing responses that they’re looking for.’ “

This is how the Wi-industry now “harvests” American youth, as if they were row crops.

The great worry is not only the deterioration of physical health, but also the mental health of these millions of young digital addicts. Dr. Kardaras says:

“Hundreds of clinical studies show that screens increase depression, anxiety and aggression and can even lead to psychotic-like features when the game player loses touch with reality.”

In such a deep state of techno-bondage, America’s small-screen stoners are obviously incapable of caring about their personal well-being, let alone about the disastrous impact upon all living creatures from the millions of antennas needed to service their Wi-addiction.


At least we now understand why mobile providers can’t run fast enough to erect more antennas across the landscape. Take for example Indiana’s 2015 announcement that the state would erect an additional 300 cell towers on park lands, state officials perhaps realizing that no small-screen addict could possibly visit a recreational park without a “fix.” [26] Meantime, industry publications such as The Wireless Estimator describe in detail the unfathomable and forever-profits flowing to wireless providers and infrastructure industries which carry death in their wings. The Estimator has also provided detailed reports of workers, especially hapless “tower dogs,” who die in accidents while constructing wireless towers across the nation. [27]

A real eyeopener would be an independent national study of cancer and leukemia incidence among thousands of Wi-workers who are routinely sent up towers and onto roofs to service active antennas without proper radiation protection. As 5G millimeter wave antennas are affixed to power poles across the nation, electrical linemen will automatically become “tower dogs.”  Provided with neither health warning nor proper shielding gear, they will be assaulted close up with experimental millimeter wave carcinogen. Their exposures will be in horrendous violation of the Nuremberg Code which prohibits any experiment on humans where there is priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury could occur.

As with tobacco, asbestos, diethylstilbestrol, vinyl chloride and thalidomide, all Wi-irradiated persons will inevitably suffer the effects of unbridled, unregulated and improperly tested microwave pollution. Through inevitable illness and mental impairment inherent in this radiation, Americans who survive our current era of Wi-mania will ultimately recount the bitter lessons learned from violating every natural law in order to obtain the pleasure, comfort, entertainment and convenience of wireless technologies. As with smokers across the decades, millions of Wi-victims will undoubtedly be catapulted into body landfills before society, as a whole, finally “gets it.”

Fourth Generation Wireless Is Coming Down Hard Now

With gay abandon, Wi-addicted Megahertz Mamas and Gigahertz Guys are calling down upon themselves an unlimited and brutal blizzard of antenna radiation.  Driven to Wi-madness by an amoral and predatory industry, these herd humans are thundering towards more and more and more wireless consumption, increasing the need for ever more antennas in ever more places.  The exponentially powerful 4G/LTE tower seen above was erected in late 2016. It’s one of thousands of new 4G towers going up across the nation as fast as construction crews can be assembled. The 4G towers, loaded with extra-wide MIMO antennas, excrete pulsed radiation within the frequency realms of: 450 MHz, 700 to 800 MHz, 1.4 to 2.3 GHz and 2.5 to 2.7 GHz. Additional 4G spectrum at 3.4-3.65 GHz is being developed. Notice that the new 4G/LTE antennas are planted exceptionally low to the ground, compared to older tower antennas. The lower the antennas, the higher the emissions at ground level. Chronic exposure to these emissions are well-documented to be as insidious and as ultimately deadly as nuclear radiation.

If you don’t have an affordable audio microwave detector with which to hear the intense and noxious radiation raging to and from antennas like these, it’s a darned shame!  The metallic microwave “scream” is unwavering and intense for over a mile in all directions from this particular tower.  The words to the “music” go something like this: SWING LOW SWEET CHARIOT, COMIN’ FOR TO TAKE US ALL HOME. Property owners of the residence seen to the left of this 4G tower may receive a handsome lease payment for hosting the facility on their doorstep.  But here is the type of public warning signs that are posted at the base of cell tower complexes:

The toxic 4G/LTE towers make possible the streaming of TV, movies and videos for America’s youth, wrapped around their smart phones and tablets 24/7. A sizeable percentage of traffic coming through 4G antennas is video, game and movie streaming for mobile devices, now that Americans have been conditioned to expect small screen entertainment everywhere they go. A kid streaming a video or movie into a phone or tablet that he holds in his hands, with Bluetooth buds in his ears, is downloading an extremely complex mishmash of electronic signals directly into his body and brain for long periods of time. He’s not just streaming his screen jollies, he’s also infusing his skull and eyes with modulated radiation documented to cause severe damage to the structure and function of his entire nervous system.

Hold an audio microwave meter to the skull of a kid downloading pulsed 4G data into his brain.

You won’t believe what you hear in the way of microwave signal intensity!

You will be listening to the sound of perfidious and monumental child abuse.

What is most shocking about the Microwave Age is not that profit-mongers will gleefully deploy deadly radiation to maim and kill kids for a “buck,” but that most Americans submit to such abuse in a livestock sort of way.  Unaware, disinterested and possibly too dim to survive as a genetically viable species, Americans just “suck it up.” Despite thousands of medical studies warning of dire medical ramifications, the masses remain willfully clueless about what the US military knew seventy-five years ago: that each human tissue and internal organ has its own dielectric properties and that the brain, heart and lungs are primary hot spots for the wave carcinogen ever-flowing through weak and ailing bodies. [28]

In 2015, the lucky people of  France were blessed with national legislation that provides these protections in regards to  RF/microwave antenna pollution:

1.  Cell tower compliance with public exposure standards are routinely verified by officials of the National Radiofrequence Agency.

2.   Up-to-date environmental/cell tower maps plus radiation measurements near homes are made available to the public and every resident is able to access information on radiation levels in his own living spaces.

3.   Areas with atypical microwave exposure are subject to consistent compliance inspection and enforcement.

4.  The French national government continues evaluation of health effects from microwave antennas and follows up with scientific research to study public health effects.

5.   All Wi-Fi hotspots are clearly marked with a warning pictogram. [29]

France and other countries are moving towards this sanity because the number of media reports about human cancer clusters near cell towers is staggering.  A 2010 report in the Telegraph newspaper of Britain is typical:

“Half of the residents of Buckler, Cornwall, have complained of ill health since the structure [mobile phone antenna tower] was installed two years ago.  They believe that the 02 mobile phone mast has contributed to the death of eight residents from cancer since it was erected… ‘We are living in a cancer cluster,’ said Mr. Lewis. ‘More than fifty per cent of the residents here said they have had serious health problems since the mast was put up.  Then people suddenly started dying from cancer and now two more have just been diagnosed and one of those is terminally ill.’ ” [30]

Such reports from around the world have been accumulating for decades, one of them documenting a cancer cluster of over one hundred cases at a public school in Spain with an antenna tower on campus. [31] There are countless archived reports of entire communities reporting ill health after cellular antennas are activated, such as 162 antenna-sickenedpeople in Nobeoka City, Japan. [32]  Yet tragically, America’s federal, state and local governments profit so hugely from the Wi-cancerization of the USA, that none see fit to gather environmental radiation measurements and enforce compliance. Crucial cell tower emissions information is kept inaccessible to the public. There is no popular demand for proper tower setbacks from inhabited buildings. There is no momentum for desperately needed investigations of neighborhood antenna sickness. The obvious reward for such savage oblivion is the fact that the women of North America — USA and Canada —  now suffer the highest female cancer rates in the world. [33]

Listed below are published studies, mainly from medical and scientific sources, which document the dramatic health effects of cancer-delivery antennas sited close to public and residential places. These reports describe mainly the bio-effects of the older broadcast, radar and 2G/3G antenna technologies. No one yet has a clear understanding of how the newer 4G multiple beam technologies and the new 3D beam-forming matrix systems and the upcoming 5G millimeter wave technologies can maim and exterminate. But at least, these preliminary studies provide primitive data about microwave sickness, in all of its ugly manifestations. Be assured that since the mid-1980s, millions of people in every state USA have been suffering the horrific fallout of antenna radiation, as documented below. If anyone cared enough to research your radiation-drenched neighborhood, here is what they would find (and more):

Antenna Sickness Studies Describing the Current State of Public Health, USA 

  • Lester and Moore (1982) This study of 92 active Air Force bases operational between 1950-1969 found that counties with an active base had significantly higher incidences of cancer mortality compared to counties without. The authors hypothesized that the chronic, low intensity microwave exposure to peak pulse patterns characteristic of radar (microwave radiation) at the bases could damage immunity and account for the high cancer mortality in military counties. [34] Numerous other reports of community sickness from radar installations have come to light in the last thirty years. Recent reports include: an epidemic of sickness and mental retardation suffered by people in Taiwan who live close to Doppler weather radar stations [35] and an ongoing investigation of a childhood cancer cluster near eight military-grade radar towers in Herkimer County, New York State. [36] In addition to police, weather and military radar pollution which blankets the US, the upcoming V2V and driverless car/truck systems are slated to additionally smother the population with new and universal systems of ground-level radar pollution. Ask John Krafcik, CEO of Google’s self-driving car division, or Elon Musk of Tesla Motors if they give a hoot!

  • Kolodynski & Kolodynska (1996) This study found that school children living near a radio location station in Latvia suffered reduced motor function, memory and attention span. [37]
  • Magras et al. (1997)  Researchers reported a decrease in reproductive function of mice exposed to cell tower radiation and irreversible sterility was documented in fifth generation offspring. [38]
  • Hecht & Balzer (1997) A review of hundreds of Soviet Russian studies documented a vast array of health effects, including insomnia, brainwave aberrations, cardiovascular problems and increased susceptibility to infections in people who lived or worked near RF/microwave antenna transmission sites. [39]

  • Colorado Department of Health Audits of Lookout Mountain Broadcast Towers near Golden, Colorado: State audits conducted in 1999 and 2004 found a statistically significant brain tumor incidence in populations living closest to and in direct line-of-sight to TV/FM radio towers on Lookout Mountain. Some affected populations were irradiated with broadcast radiation at levels 100 times or more lower than the FCC’s non-ionizing radiation limits. [40]
  • Santini et al. (2002) 530 people living near mobile phone masts in France reported headaches, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, memory loss and concentration problems.  These effects were more pronounced the closer people lived to the mast. The researchers concluded that the minimal distance of people from cell tower antennas should not be less than 300 meters. However, this recommended minimal distance pertains only to the antennas affecting people in this particular study and does not necessarily pertain to other antenna installations, which may be more far-reaching due to power density, or more acutely bio-intensive due to various frequencies emitted. [41]
  • Santini et al. (2003) This was the second part of the above Santini study, and it confirmed results of the 2002 study.  It also showed that people irradiated for five years or more suffered significantly increased irritability, compared to those exposed to a shorter duration. Also, older people were documented to be more sensitive to the radiation.  Homes that faced antennas, particularly within 100 meters, were documented to be the worst locations for certain debilitating symptoms. [42]

  • Navarro EA et al. (2003) This study, conducted in Spain, found that the greater the power density of microwaves in the home, the more severe were complaints of depression, fatigue, sleeping disorders, concentration problems, headaches, irritability, memory problems, loss of appetite, nausea, audio and visual dysfunction, dizziness and cardiovascular problems. The researchers concluded:  “There is a large and coherent body of evidence of biological mechanisms that support the conclusion of a plausible, logical and causal relationship between RF exposure and neurological disease. Hence, it is probable that cell sites are causing many adverse health effects. Public health surveys of people living in the vicinity of cell site should be being carried out now, and continued progressively over the next two decades. This isbecause prompt effects such as miscarriage, cardiac disruption, sleep disturbance and chronic fatigue could well be early indicators of the adverse health effects.” [43]
  • Roosli (2004)  This Swiss survey study reported that out of 429 questionnaires returned, 394 people reported symptoms from cell tower exposure.  Fifty eight percent of these symptomatic people suffered headaches, 19% nervous stress, 18% fatigue, while concentration difficulties were the most common complaint.  “Two thirds of complainants had taken some action to reduce their symptoms.  The most common measure was to avoid exposure if possible.” [44]
  • Eger et al. (2004)  This study, commissioned by the German Federal Agency for Radiation Protection, compiled medical histories between 1994-2004 of  people living in Naila, Germany. The study found a threefold increase in malignant tumors for people exposed for five years or more to cell tower antennas within 400 meters, compared to people living further away from the antennas. [45]

    • Wolf and Wolf  (2004) A Tel Aviv University study of 622 people living in Netanya, Israel, revealed an overall four-fold increase in the incidence of cancer among residents living within 350 meters of a mobile phone mast for a time period of between three and seven years. Among women in the 350-meter group, the increase in cancer was 10 times the norm,compared to people living in other areas of the city:  “The study indicates an association between increased incidence of cancer and living in proximity to a cell phone transmitter station.” [46]
    • Bortkiewicz et al. (2004)  This Polish study confirmed that residents living close to mobile phone masts reported “various complaints mostly of the circulatory system, but also of sleep disturbances, irritability, depression, blurred vision, concentration difficulties, nausea, lack of appetite, headache and vertigo. The performed studies showed the relationship between the incidence of individual symptoms, the level of exposure, and the distance between a residential area and a base station. This association was observed in both groups of persons, those who linked their complaints with the presence of the base station and those who did not notice such a relation.” [47]
    • California study (2004)  A pilot medical study, conducted by Dr. Gunnar Heuser of Agoura Hills, California, focused on neurological symptoms of six firefighters who had been working for up to five years in stations with cell towers on premises. Their symptoms included: slowed reaction time, lack of focus, lack of impulse control, severe headaches, anesthesia-like sleep, depression, tremors and toxic encephalopathy, involving brain damage to frontal and temporal lobes, as confirmed by SPECT brain scans. In 2004, citing this study, the US and Canadian membership of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) passed a resolution opposing the siting of cell tower antennas on or adjacent to fire stations. [48]

      • Waldman-Salsam et al. (2004)   Medical doctors in Oberfranken, Germany, evaluated the medical complaints of 356 people exposed to cell tower radiation and in-home wireless devices. This irradiated population reported these symptoms: sleep disturbances, tiredness, forgetfulness, nose bleeds, vision and hearing problems, frequent infections, blood pressure abnormalities, hormonal and heart disturbances, nausea and night-time sweats. This information was presented to the German prime minister in a now-famous document known as the Bamberg Appeal, signed by 114 German physicians.  [49]
      • Hutter et al. (2005) 365 people living near 10 different mobile phone masts in both urban and rural areas of Austria were studied. Reported symptoms of antenna radiation included: headache, vertigo, tremors, cold hands and feet, loss of energy, exhaustion, difficulty concentrating, feelings of strain and the urge for sleep. These people were irradiated at levels of 0.2 to 0.4 volts per meter, which is hundreds of times lower than legal US exposure standards of 47 to 61 volts per meter. The higher the voltage exposure, the higher the percentage of health complaints. The researchers concluded: “The results of this study indicate that effects of very low but long lasting exposures to emissions from mobile telephone base stations on well-being and health cannot be ruled out.” [50]
      • Citizens Initiative Kempton West (2006-2007) Anticipating the installation of a T-Mobile transmitter station in a neighborhood, 25 participating residents living between 15 to 300 meters from the new cell tower volunteered for blood sampling before the antennas were turned on. These volunteers removed all DECT phones and Wi-Fi systems from their homes for the test period. This study was part of a German-wide medical investigation into the effects of cell tower radiation on human health, led by Dr. Hans Scheiner in Munich. The study focused mainly on blood levels of the mood hormone serotonin and the sleep hormone melatonin, both created by the pineal gland. A healthy person creates serotonin by day for alertness and energy, melatonin by night for deep restorative sleep and protection from DNA damage.  After the antennas were turned on, follow-up blood tests revealed this:

1.  Fifty-six percent of volunteers suffered a fairly steep reduction of night time melatonin and 28 percent showed a more gradual decline, leading to considerable sleep disturbances, daytime exhaustion and immune deficiencies due to sleep deprivation.

2.  Eighty-four percent of volunteers suffered a steep decrease in day time serotonin levels, resulting in depressive mood disturbances, lethargy, appetite abnormalities, agitation and general reduction of quality of life.

Signed by three medical doctors this study concluded: “Since the medically conducted tests carried out on residents living in the vicinity of the….mast prove a dramatically increased health risk, immediate action by political and regulatory authorities…are demanded.” [51]

    • Abdel-Rassoul, et al. (2006)  Residents living beneath or adjacent to a long-established mobile phone mast with numerous antennas in Egypt reported significantly higher occurrences of headaches, memory changes, dizziness, tremors, depressive symptoms and sleep disturbance than did a control group. [52]
    • Oberfeld et al. (2008) The Austrian Department of Health uncovered a higher risk of cancer among people living 80-200 meters from a mobile phone antenna tower which operated for a car phone service between 1984 and 1997. The study concluded  that the cancer risk increased with the length of exposure, reaching 8.5 times the norm for people most highly exposed. The study reported: “The incidence [of cancer] was particularly pronounced for breast and brain tumors.” [53]
    • Eger et al. (2009)  The Bavarian town of Selbitz conduced a health survey of 251 residents exposed to cell tower radiation at no more than 1 volt per meter. The study found a significant correlation, depending on dose exposure, for: insomnia, depression, cerebral symptoms, joint illnesses, infections, skin changes, heart and circulation disorders, disorders of vision/ hearing and problems of the gastrointestinal tract. [54]

  • Balmori et al. (2009) Researchers exposed tadpoles of the common frog to cell tower radiation from several antenna installations 140 meters from the study site. Control tadpoles were protected from the radiation by a shielded Faraday cage. The irradiated tadpoles were exposed for two months and suffered low coordination of movements, asynchronous growth (abnormally large and small tadpoles) plus a 90% mortality rate. The non-irradiated controls developed normally and suffered only a 4.2% mortality rate.  The report concluded: “This research may have huge implications for the natural world, which is now exposed to high microwave radiation levels from a multitude of phones masts.” [55]
  • Dode et al. (2011) University and municipality officials cooperated to document a striking connection between cell tower antennas and cancer deaths in Brazil’s third largest city, Belo Horizonte. The study looked at 7191 deaths by cancer in the city between 1996 and 2006.  The highest rate of deaths from cancer was found among those who had lived within 500 meters of  cell phone antenna towers.  The highest rates of cancer were also found in the central-southern area of the city, which had the most cell towers. There were high rates of prostate, breast, lung, kidney and liver cancer among the victims living closest to tower antennas. [56]
  • Buchner et al. (2011) In this study conducted in Bavaria, Germany, urine samples of 60 study participants were analyzed for their adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, and phenylethylamine (PEA) levels before and after the activation of a new GSM cell tower. After the activation of the antennas, the stress hormone levels increased significantly during the first six months while dopamine and PEA levels decreased substantially. Even after one and a half years, the initial normal hormone levels were not restored. Sleep problems, headaches, allergies, dizziness, and concentration problems were common. The highest exposure group was only 100 µW/m2, and only 60 µW/m for the lowest exposure group. (These power density readings equate to .1 volts per meter squared to .2 volts per meter squared.) This study indicates that radio frequency transmitters induce radical changes in human stress hormones and set up the classic stress syndrome of adaptation followed by biological exhaustion, as established by Hans Seyle in the 1950s. The researchers stated that the effects of cell tower radiation “showed a dose-response relationship and occurred well below current limits for technical RF radiation exposures. Chronic dysregulation of the catecholamine system has great relevance for health and is well known to damage human health in the long run.” [57]
  • Yakymenko et al. (2011) A team of Ukrainian scientists titled their overview of cell tower radiation “Long-term Exposure to Microwave Radiation Provokes Cancer Growth: Evidences from Radars and Mobile Communication Systems.”These researchers concluded: “It is now becoming increasingly evident that assessment of biological effects of non-ionizing radiation based on physical (thermal) approach used in recommendations of current regulatory bodies…requires urgent reevaluation….We also emphasize that the everyday exposure of both occupational and general public to MW radiation should be regulated based on precautionary principles which imply maximum restriction of excessive exposure.” [58]

  • Christopher Anthony and Daniel Chen (2011) As part of a science curriculum project, these two fourteen-year-olds conducted a survey study at their school in Johannesburg, South Africa, regarding the health effects of a cell tower on their school campus. They additionally enrolled students at two other schools, also with cell towers on those campuses. Students who participated in the questionnaire study reported 21 different symptoms including: skin rash, muscular pains, heart palpitations, extreme fatigue, stomach problems, swollen lymph nodes, tinnitus, allergic reactions and metallic taste in the mouth. Seventy-nine percent of the students who participated reported some of these symptoms, thirty percent reported more than four symptoms, five percent suffered more than 10 symptoms and one percent suffered from up to 14 symptoms on the list. School officials at the boys’ school reportedly initiated proceedings to have the cell tower removed from their particular campus. [59]
  • Eskander, et al. (2012) This study followed volunteers who were exposed to microwave radiation from either mobile phones or cell tower antennas over a time period of six years. Blood tests were used for assessment. The study showed a significant decrease in volunteers’ ACTH, cortisol, thyroid hormones, prolactin for young females, and testosterone levels. Researchers concluded that “high RFR (radio frequency radiation) significantly affects the pituitary-adrenal axis.” [60]
  • Hassig et al. (2012) Scientists documented eye abnormalities in calves exposed to cell tower radiation: “We examined and monitored a dairy farm in which a large number of calves were born with nuclear cataracts after a mobile phone base station had been erected in the vicinity of the barn. Calves showed a 3.5 times higher risk for heavy cataract if born there compared to Swiss average. All usual causes such as infection or poisoning common in Switzerland could be excluded.”[61]

  • Cy et al. (2012) This Taiwanese study focused on childhood neoplasms (tumors) in relation to RF exposure from cell towers erected between 1998 and 2007. Researchers calculated the annual power emitted by all 71,185 cell towers in Taiwan and compared the calculated exposure of populations in each irradiated township: “This study noted a significantly increased risk of all neoplasms [abnormal growths, especially as a characteristic of cancer] in children with higher-than-median RF exposure to MPBS [mobile phone base stations].” [62]
  • Gomez-Peretta et al.  (2013) This study in Spain was a re-analysis of the data collected for the  Navarro study  (2003). The researchers reported that pathological symptoms reported by irradiated people were validated once again. Exposure levels suffered by study participants were reported at only .2 volts to .6 volts per meter [compared to US maximum public exposure limit of 61 volts per meter]. [63]
  • Shahbazi et al. (2014) This Iranian study was conducted on 250 randomly-selected people living near cell towers. Statistically significant symptoms included: nausea, headache, dizziness, irritability, discomfort, nervousness, depression, sleep disturbances, memory loss and lack of libido among people living within 300 meters of the cell tower antennas,compared to those living further away. [64]

  • Ghandi et al. (2014) This case-control study evaluated genetic damage in individuals living in the vicinity of cell towers. The blood of irradiated subjects showed significantly elevated DNA damage compared to non-irradiated control subjects matched for gender, age and other factors. Especially affected by cell tower DNA damage were females. The researchers warned: “The genetic damage evident in the participants in this study needs to be addressed against future disease-risk, which in addition to neurodegenerative disorders, may lead to cancer.”  [65]
  • Shiniyo et al. (2014) This Japanese study, peer-reviewed by a German medical team, documents the myriad serious health effects suffered by condominium inhabitants living under rooftop antennas in Japan. This study is important because it documents a long list of illnesses suffered by the condo inhabitants during their years of exposure and compares the improved health status of survivors after the antennas were deactivated. The symptoms ascribed to microwave radiation by this study include: numerous and painful neurological dysfunctions, eye damage, severe fatigue and tumors. [66]
  • Adebayo et al. (2014) Nigerian scientists investigated the effects of cell tower radiation on disease-causing bacteria isolated from the environment within range of that radiation. They discovered that various gram negative bacteria showed major effects from the radiation and they confirmed that microwave radiation appears to make certain of these pathogens antibiotic-resistant. [67]
  • Cammaerts Tricot et al. (2015) Two renowned European scientists conducting this study found that water cress seeds would not germinate in a room infiltrated with cell tower radiation from two antennas about 200 meters outside the windows of the room. Measurements showed that the antennas were propagating 900 megahertz and 1.8 gigahertz directly into the room. The power density of the radiation impacting the seed trays was only .1 volts per meter2.  This is a power density hundreds of times lower than that approved for US public exposure to microwave radiation in the gigahertz range. Identical but radiation-protected seed trays in the same room germinated normally:  “When removed from theelectromagnetic fields, seeds germinated normally.  The radiation was, thus, most likely the cause of the non-occurrence of the seeds’ imbibitation and germination.” [68]

    • Sultan Ayoub Meo et al. (2015)  This study recruited students in Saudi Arabia for blood testing (ages 12 to 17) attending two comparable schools.  Students in the school infused with the highest cell tower radiation suffered a higher rate of diabetes than the students less irradiated: “It is concluded that exposure to high RF-EMRF generated by mobile phone base stations is associated with elevated levels of HbA1c and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.” [69]
    • Waldmann-Selsam (2016) Using mathematical calculations of microwave power flux density, this field-monitoring study examined the effects of cell tower radiation on trees in two German cities: “Statistical analysis demonstrate that electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone masts is harmful for trees.  These results are consistent with the fact that damage afflicted on trees by mobile phone towers usually starts on one side, extending to the whole tree over time.” [70]
    • Golati et al. (2016)  The objective of this study was to evaluate human genetic damage caused by radiation from mobile tower antennas and to ascertain whether that damage might be dependent upon the aberrant  GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. Scientists studied 116 persons exposed to radiation from mobile towers and 106 control subjects.  All  were genotyped for polymorphisms in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction method.  The researchers looked for DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes using alkaline comet assay and micronucleus assay in buccal (mouth tissues) cells.  They found no evidence that the two particular genes were involved in promoting that DNA damage among the subjects. But they did find significant DNA damage among cell tower subjects as compared to the non-irradiated control group: The report states:  “…There was a significant increase in BMN [micronucleus assay in buccal cells] frequency and TM [tail moment] value in exposed subjects (3.65 ± 2.44 and 6.63 ± 2.32) compared with control subjects (1.23 ± 0.97 and 0.26 ± 0.27)…” [71]
    • Siersma et al. (2016)  As a pilot run for future and larger studies, medical scientists from Denmark and Sweden launched an electronic questionnaire posted to special interest websites. The questionnaire requested feedback on symptoms suffered by people exposed to cell phones, Wi-Fi, occupational radiation, energy-saving light bulbs and cell towers. Of sixty respondents, significant associations were noted for both chronic exposure to Wi-Fi and for cell tower exposure. Symptoms associated with tower antennas included: cognitive, head, eye, body and skin problems. The report noted: “Mobile phone towers seem to be the most problematic of the various EMF exposures.” [72]
    • Romero-Ortega et al. (2016)  University of Texas researchers confirmed that ampututees exposed to cell tower radiation, at a power density equivalent to that encountered at a distance of about 39 meters from the average local antenna site, may be induced by that radiation to suffer abnormal sensations and neuropathic pain in peripheral nerve bundles that form after the nerve injury of amputation.  According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are nearly two million amputees in the United States and many of them suffer from chronic pain. [73]
    • Zothansiama et al. (2017) This study, conducted in India by a government-sponsored university, evaluated DNA damage and antioxidant status of people living in the vicinity of cell towers (witihin 80 meters) conpared to healthy controls who lived further away from microwave antennas. The blood of cell tower victims showed significant DNA damage, and they suffered notable deficits in serum antioxidants (cancer fighting substances) compared to the less-irradiated control group. [74]

Since the Microwave Age began three decades ago, the radiation-sick and the radiation-wise have avoided antenna hotspots whenever possible and have wisely sought safer places.  What the Wireless Radiation Industry calls “dead zones” have long been Nirvana to those who prefer to preserve the integrity of natural life and skip the gruesome experiences of microwave sickness and Wi-cancer. Now, the industry’s foremost goal is to completely eliminate the existence of “dead zones” so that every “connected” thing in the human anthrosphere can be watched, manipulated and controlled by Central Authority.

While concerned bio-scientists ride a stage coach to assess damage from the older and tamer ray technologies, the great and powerful Techno-Beast rides an F-16 in its inexhaustible quest for new ways to radiation-rape the planet and deconstruct every living thing upon it.  Well-funded armies of radiation operatives, most of them young males (the demographic reportedly best able to withstand chronic electromagnetic abuse), are working relentlessly to churn out new experimental devices and propagation systems for the Internet of Things (IoT), plus for 5G millimeter wave technologies. These upcoming weapons of mass destruction require millions of tiny, new antennas that will submerge all living creatures in yet an additional tsunami of wave carcinogen.

For the USA, already blighted with the highest rates of cancer on this earth,
there are only four words out of the wireless train wreck ahead:

“Thanks, but no thanks!”

No thanks to unsafe, hand-held mobile devices that eviscerate the DNA

 No thanks to microwave-infused buildings that make people weak and ill

 No thanks to decadent mobile entertainment for babies and grade schoolers

 No thanks to the unregulated Wi-Fi assault of fetuses and kindergartners

 No thanks to microcells hung on office walls and hidden under stadium seats

 No thanks to “smart” meters and appliances that induce and stimulate tumors

 No thanks to consumer gadgets and vehicles that beam Wi-Fi/Blutetooth

 No thanks to cell towers and DAS small-cell antennas mounted near doorsteps

 No thanks to bizarre mass experiments with millimeter wave technologies

A nation unable to say “no thanks” to its own violent destruction surely has a hard road down. Human history indicates that all deadly mass manias eventually reach their limit, but usually only after millions of people have suffered and died tragically. The questions remain: how far will America’s Wi-holocaust progress before survivors finally comprehend the appalling price of unsafe RF/microwave technologies, before they finally understand that forcibly infusing an entire population with the VOLTAGE OF CANCER is sheer madness?


%d bloggers like this: