Two 5G bills and a tight timeline. Make those phones ring!

Urgent Action Items
Two 5G bills and a tight timeline. Make those phones ring!For New York Residents:

Hey New Yorkers, we have a bill in the Assembly (A6448) and the Senate (S5926) that, when passed,  would establish a commission to study the health and environmental effects of 5G technology.  

Getting the bill introduced wasn’t easy, but now our brave legislators who went out on a limb need your strong support!

If you’re a New York resident, we urgently need you to call your state representatives and tell them to support these important bills.

It only takes a few seconds to call, and the return on your time investment can be HUGE.

Learn more about these two “same-as” bills below:
 Info. Flyer on New York State 5G Bills Link to Bill S 5926Link to Bill A 6448If you live in New York, click the red button below and enter your mailing address to find out who your New York State representatives are (you have one State Assembly representative and one State Senate representative).

When you call, simply say that you want your representative to support and/or co-sponsor either the Assembly bill or the Senate bill (depending on who you’re calling). For example, if you live in Scarsdale, New York, Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins is your State Senator. So, you would call the Senator’s office and say that you want the Senator to support and/or co-sponsor Senate Bill 5926.

Again, please note that the wording for both the 5G Assembly bill and the 5G Senate bill is exactly the same.
 Contact Your NY State Reps!For All Other Residents: If you don’t live in New York, please encourage your state representatives to follow in New Hampshire and New York’s footsteps by sending them this sample legislation calling for the establishment of a commission to evaluate the environmental and health effects of the deployment of 5G wireless technology. 
 Contact Your State Reps Now!Sample 5G Legislation Available HereGeneral 5G Action Toolkit HereUpcoming EventFilm Screening: Wednesday, May 5th, 2021 @ 9pm ESTOn Wednesday, May 5th at 9pm EST, watch a free screening of the award-winning documentary “Complicit.”

The film reveals the stunning, life-threatening conditions inside of smartphone manufacturing facilities, and tells the story of Yi Yeting, a migrant worker suffering from occupational leukemia.

Following the screening will be a Q&A with Dr. Devra Davis, Founder of the Environmental Health Trust, and Heather White, Co-Director of the film.
 Watch the Movie TrailerRegister to Attend the Virtual ScreeningRSVP on FacebookHave you checked out the new TechSafe Schools Project, yet?Grassroots Environmental Education and Grassroots Communications are very pleased to announce the launch of the TechSafe Schools Project – a multi-faceted program designed to help schools reduce exposure to RF radiation. 

The TechSafe Schools project consists of a personal letter addressed to school administrators, a legal letter from seven prominent attorneys with experience in wireless radiation and tort litigation, and a short Q&A brochure about RF radiation in schools. Three educational webinars, featuring some of the world’s leading wireless radiation experts, were also held last month. You can view the webinar recordings here.If you would like us to send an informational package about the TechSafe Schools Project to your school district officials, please email us here.
 Access the New WebsiteWatch the Introductory VideoPlease don’t hesitate to reach out to us if you have any questions or concerns. We’re here to help. And as always, thanks for helping us fight the good fight.-The 5G Crisis Team
To
Urgent Action Items
Two 5G bills and a tight timeline. Make those phones ring!For New York Residents:Hey New Yorkers, we have a bill in the Assembly (A6448) and the Senate (S5926) that, when passed,  would establish a commission to study the health and environmental effects of 5G technology.  

Getting the bill introduced wasn’t easy, but now our brave legislators who went out on a limb need your strong support!

If you’re a New York resident, we urgently need you to call your state representatives and tell them to support these important bills.

It only takes a few seconds to call, and the return on your time investment can be HUGE.

Learn more about these two “same-as” bills below:
 Info. Flyer on New York State 5G BillsLink to Bill S 5926Link to Bill A 6448If you live in New York, click the red button below and enter your mailing address to find out who your New York State representatives are (you have one State Assembly representative and one State Senate representative).

When you call, simply say that you want your representative to support and/or co-sponsor either the Assembly bill or the Senate bill (depending on who you’re calling). For example, if you live in Scarsdale, New York, Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins is your State Senator. So, you would call the Senator’s office and say that you want the Senator to support and/or co-sponsor Senate Bill 5926.

Again, please note that the wording for both the 5G Assembly bill and the 5G Senate bill is exactly the same.
 Contact Your NY State Reps!For All Other Residents: If you don’t live in New York, please encourage your state representatives to follow in New Hampshire and New York’s footsteps by sending them this sample legislation calling for the establishment of a commission to evaluate the environmental and health effects of the deployment of 5G wireless technology. 
 Contact Your State Reps Now!Sample 5G Legislation Available HereGeneral 5G Action Toolkit HereUpcoming EventFilm Screening: Wednesday, May 5th, 2021 @ 9pm ESTOn Wednesday, May 5th at 9pm EST, watch a free screening of the award-winning documentary “Complicit.”

The film reveals the stunning, life-threatening conditions inside of smartphone manufacturing facilities, and tells the story of Yi Yeting, a migrant worker suffering from occupational leukemia.

Following the screening will be a Q&A with Dr. Devra Davis, Founder of the Environmental Health Trust, and Heather White, Co-Director of the film.
 Watch the Movie TrailerRegister to Attend the Virtual ScreeningRSVP on FacebookHave you checked out the new TechSafe Schools Project, yet?Grassroots Environmental Education and Grassroots Communications are very pleased to announce the launch of the TechSafe Schools Project – a multi-faceted program designed to help schools reduce exposure to RF radiation. 

The TechSafe Schools project consists of a personal letter addressed to school administrators, a legal letter from seven prominent attorneys with experience in wireless radiation and tort litigation, and a short Q&A brochure about RF radiation in schools. Three educational webinars, featuring some of the world’s leading wireless radiation experts, were also held last month. You can view the webinar recordings here.If you would like us to send an informational package about the TechSafe Schools Project to your school district officials, please email us here.
 Access the New WebsiteWatch the Introductory VideoPlease don’t hesitate to reach out to us if you have any questions or concerns. We’re here to help. And as always, thanks for helping us fight the good fight.-The 5G Crisis Team

“Wireless Hazards” — An extensive exposé published by The Washington Spectator

Excerpts:“Wireless Hazards” — An extensive exposé published by The Washington Spectator

Excerpts: However, the industry’s message is so widely accepted that contradictory information is routinely discarded. One scientist (who asked for anonymity) told me he recently was asked to advise a state committee about 5G guidelines. “When I tried to tell them about the hazards from the hundreds of thousands or millions of new antennas that will be installed, they weren’t interested. . . . For example, in 2013, President Obama named Tom Wheeler, the CEO of the main trade group, the CTIA, to chair the FCC. In a 2016 talk, Wheeler said, “We won’t wait for standards to be developed. . . . Instead, we will rely on the private sector to produce them.” On 5G, he told doubters to “stay out of the way. . . . Tens of billions of dollars in economic activity . . . is what’s important.” 

SNIPThe post “Wireless Hazards” — An extensive exposé published by The Washington Spectator first appeared on EMFacts Consultancy.
Read on »

HOW DO WE REALLY TRUST SCIENCE? YOU STILL HAVE TO DO THE WORK AND USE YOUR COMMON SENSE!!!!!

View in browser


Aussie No-effects team finds no effects from 5G
There’s nothing to worry about from the high-frequency radiation used by 5G. Or is there? Two papers on 5G radiation, by scientists from Swinburne University of Technology and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), were published online on 16 March. On the one hand the authors of these papers claim that there is ‘no confirmed evidence’ that this radiation can be ‘hazardous’ to human health. On the other hand, they base their conclusions on some dubious assumptions. In the first, Karipides et al 1 conducted a review of 107 experimental studies and 31 epidemiological studies on the effects of radiofrequency radiation above 6 GHz. This includes some 5G frequencies (other 5G frequencies are below 6GHz) and millimetre waves (30—300 GHz) that are expected to be used in future generations of technology. The authors concluded that their review ‘provided no confirmed evidence that low-level MMWs [millimetre microwaves] are associated with biological effects relevant to human health. ’In the second paper, Wood et al 2 conducted a meta-analysis of 107 studies on millimetre microwaves in which exposures were lower than the occupational limits of international guidelines published by ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection).They concluded ‘there is little consistent evidence to support the notion of biological effects from MMWs at levels below the INCIRP occupational limits. ’Commenting on the papers, Dr Gillian Hirth ARPANSA’s Deputy CEO and Chief Radiation Health Scientist said, ‘ARPANSA is proud to continue our contribution to research and assessment of 5G radiation safety. The work is core to our involvement in the Australian Government’s Electromagnetic Energy Program and helps us deliver on our vision of a safe radiation environment for the Australian Community. ’So both papers give 5G a clean bill of health – apparently. But here are some of the problems with the papers and reasons why we shouldn’t be too quick to accept their conclusions that 5G is safe. Problem 1: ICNIRP The authors of the two papers assume that radiation exposures are safe, as long as they comply with limits of the radiation guidelines published by the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).But who or what is ICNIRP? While ICNIRP promotes itself as an international authority on radiation protection, the body enjoys anything but universal respect. It is a private organisation that has been described as ‘a privately constituted group, with self-appointed membership’ 3 and as a ‘cartel’ that ‘systematically discredits all studies that show possible dangers to human health’ 4 and its members have links to the telecommunications industry. Problem 2: ICNIRP Guidelines Not surprisingly the Guidelines published by ICNIRP allow higher exposures than have been shown to cause harmful effects on the human body. This is because ICNIRP argues that the only effects on the body of concern are those that occur when radiation causes a temperature rise in tissues of over 1 degree Celsius. This is despite the fact that there is a large body of science showing that a considerable number harmful effects occur at exposures below these limits that could cause serious health problems and unpleasant symptoms. There are other problems with the assumptions underlying the ICNIRP Guidelines which have been discussed extensively in previous issues of EMR and Health. Because of problems such as these, hundreds of scientists from over 40 nations have endorsed an appeal to the World Health Organisation calling for stricter radiation standards. 5So, complying with ICNIRP Guidelines is no guarantee of safety at al. Problem 3: Confirmed evidence The Karipidis paper says that there was no ‘confirmed evidence that low level MMWs are associated with biological effects relevant to human health’. In other words, there was evidence, but not evidence that it was willing to accept or that has been ‘confirmed’. However, it’s not always easy to confirm studies that have found evidence of harm, partly because funding is not made available to do so. An Australian study by Dr Pam Sykes is a case in point. Dr Sykes conducted a pilot study which found genetic changes in mice exposed to mobile phone radiation. The National Health and Medical Research Council, which included an advisor from Motorola, did not make funding available for a follow-up study to help ‘confirm’ the results.6Ignoring evidence of risk because it has not been ‘confirmed’ is to court disaster. The history of science teaches us the risk of ignoring scientific studies showing evidence of risk because they’ve failed to meet an arbitrary benchmark for conclusiveness and rolling out products that have later been found to be harmful. Asbestos, lead, thalidomide, tobacco, DDT are just a few examples. Problem 4: Bias Four of the five authors on the papers are employed by ARPANSA.ARPANSA is anything but an impartial organisation. It has consistently denied evidence of risk, even though there is plenty of it. The ARPANSA website says, ‘There is no substantiated scientific evidence to support any adverse health effects from low-level exposure to RF EME associated with telecommunications and wireless technology below the limits set within the ARPANSA RF Standard.’ 7 Yet, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classed wireless radiation as a Class 2B carcinogen.In stakeholder meetings, ARPANSA consistently argued that there was ‘no evidence of risk’ even when handed papers showing evidence of risk. So the fact that ARPANSA’s no-effects team has found no effects is hardly surprising. Is 5G safe?Does this mean that millimetre waves are safe? Not according to some researchers. In 2020, Professor Dariusz Lezczynski conducted a review of the relevant research on millimetre waves and concluded that there is insufficient scientific evidence to make definitive judgements about the safety of these exposures and that precautionary measures should be put in place to protect against potential risks. 8‘At the heart of the controversy is the importance of the skin to overall health and well-being. On the one hand, the ARPANSA paper appears to regard exposure of the skin as of little consequence. ‘…for frequencies above 6 GHz the depth of penetration is relatively short with surface heating being the predominant effect,’ Karipides et al wrote. However, the skin plays an important role in health, according to Vic Leach from the Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA).He says, ‘Skin as an organ is rich in nerves and is the body’s first defence from chemical or mechanical exposures. The skin has receptors that carry out abundant innervation associated with the central nervous system and blood vessels which, in turn, are interconnected with other organs. Skin innervation is carried out by both branches of the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems. Skin also plays a role in regulation of immunity. The surface of the skin is a natural environment for thousands of protective microbial species. ‘Skin performs endocrine functions and produces vitamin D in a chemical reaction that occurs when sunlight hits it. Ultra -Violet (UV), another form of non-ionising radiation, is used to make Vitamin D that our bodies need for health. Is this man-made 5G radiation going to change Vitamin D production? We don’t know because nobody has studied this. ‘Currently, it is difficult to predict the effects of millimetre waves on many skin diseases (eg eczema, psoriasis, abscesses) or on the development of tumour processes (e.g. melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma). ICNIRP or ARPANSA’s guidelines ignore all bioeffects except heating as having any health impact. I believe the current power density levels cannot be justified. Much lower intensity levels need to be adopted before the densification of the EMF background with the role out of 5G smalls cells on approximately every third power pole.’ 9ARPANSA’s papers attempt to assure us that the rollout of 5G technology that has been allowed by the federal government and is being undertaken by industries that will profit from it, is not going to harm us. The reality is that it will take more than these reviews to establish whether 5G is, in fact, safe and that no one, however young, old, pregnant, ill or sensitive will suffer as a result of exposure. Time will surely tell.1. Ken Karipidis, Rohan Mate, David Urban, Rick Tinker, Andrew Wood, ’5G mobile networks and health—a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz’, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370…https://www.nature.com/article…2. Andrew Wood, Rohan Mate, Ken Karipidis, ‘Meta-analysis of in vitro and in vivo studies of the biological effects of low-level millimetre waves’, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370…https://www.nature.com/article…3. ‘Health, science and wireless radiation’, EMR and Health, May 20214. ‘German Lawyer on 5G’, EMR and Health, April 20215. The EMF Appeal, https://www.emfscientist.org/6. https://emraustralia.com.au/blogs/news-1/australian-mobile-phone-research-stymied?_pos=1&_sid=ae149a183&_ss=r7. https://www.arpansa.gov.au/regulation-and-licensing/regulatory-publications/radiation-protection-series/codes-and-standards/rpss-1-qa8. Dariusz Leszczynski, ‘Physiological effects of millimeter-waves on skin and skin cells: an overview of the to-date published studies’, Reviews on Environ Health, 35(4): 493-515, 2020.9. ARPANSA’s misinformation, Victor Leach, correspondence What can you do Don’t buy 5G devices until there is certainty that 5G is safe. Download our free White Paper on 5G here to find out more. What else you can do If you found the information above of interest, please forward this email to others .If you’d like more information, you can download our April issue of EMR and Health here. If you’ve been sent this message by a friend and would like to subscribe to future updates, you can do that here. Warm regards

Lyn McLean
Director
EMR Australia PL
www.emraustralia.com.au
02 9576 1772EMR Australia PO Box 4721 Sylvania Waters NSW 2224
Australia

The cell phone can cause mad cow disease

Microwave radiation is invisible to the eye. Viruses are invisible to the eve. The contents of vaccinations (heavy metals and nano-bots) are invisible to the eye. The scope for the abuse of truth and outright lies regarding the invisible is obvious. The daily media blitz regarding the virus and vaccinations is in stark contrast to the absence of public discussion on the dangers of electromagnetic radiation. The emergence of the so-called Green Passport could be an incremental step to the microchipping of human beings. The following article therefore remains relevant. Subsequent to publication of the article below, the author, Prof. Olle Johansson, was awarded the title “Misleader of the Year” by the Swedish Skeptics Society. Daily mainstream coverage of the virus / vaccination program for more than a year is ample evidence of social engineering where the public is being manipulated into demanding vaccinations. Even long-time opponents of electromagnetic radiation technology are being distracted by the virus crisis – real or vastly exaggerated. As long as the public remains ignorant of the dangers of electromagnetic radiation and is divided over the so-called pandemic, those wishing to implement hi-tech into everyday human life are winning. The fact remains that long after the Covid-19 pandemic (and there are others in the wings according to Melinda Gates) passes, microwave technology will still be with us as governments turn a blinded eye and the United Nations continues to promote it.

Please circulate widely

.John Weigel

Ireland

The cell phone can cause mad cow disease

Toxic proteins that migrate through the body’s barriers. This is how Mad Cow Disease occurs. And so it is for rats that are exposed to microwave radiation, 5,000 times weaker than that allowed for public exposure from mobile phones. The Swedish government plays a very dangerous game, with high stakes, with the public health writes Olle Johansson, associate professor of neuroscience.

THE FIRST ALARM in Sweden about Mad Cow Disease has just sounded. A farm in Halland (a coastal county in Sweden) first became associated with this “incredibly unlikely event, which has not really happened”, to speak in Tage Danielsson’s (one of the most famous comedians, writers, filmmakers, actors, and much more, ever in Sweden; the quote is from a brilliant monologue about the dangers and risks of nuclear power plants, after the incident in Harrisburg, 1979) words. And, fortunately, this time the analysis seems to have been false. But is this the first also the last alarm?

Minister of Agriculture Margareta Winberg has declared that there is no danger. I think she’s very wrong. I think there is a huge danger just around the corner and it is not Winberg who should say that I am wrong in my suspicion; I want the Ministers of Trade and Industry Sahlin and Rosengren (who are responsible for the expansion of wireless communication) and the Minister of Social Affairs Engqvist (who is responsible for public health) to reassure us.

No, better than that! I want an absolute guarantee for safety and an absolute responsibility declared for any future danger!

What danger am I talking about? We all know today that Mad Cow Disease (BSE) is due to cattle being fed with ground animal carcasses. In these are infectious agents, prions (special proteins), which transfer to the cattle. Under these unfortunate circumstances the infectious agent can be transported from the gastrointestinal channel to the blood and from blood, or via nerves, through the blood-brain barrier to the nerve cells in the brain. The result: a massive destruction of the brain tissue  – the animal loses of control, behaves inappropriately and eventually dies. These infectious agents can be transmitted to humans, which in a corresponding way takes the human form of “Mad Cow Disease” (Creutzfeldt-Jacob’s Disease).

The Swedish researchers Arne Brun, Bertil Persson and Leif Salford, from Lund University and Hospital, have recently made a sensational discovery. They found, and this confirmed the results of other researchers, that very weak mobile phone-type microwave signals break down the blood-brain barrier in rats, whereby toxic proteins can penetrate and damage the brain. The resemblance to Mad Cow Disease is striking. Against this background, it must be considered most likely that Mad Cow Disease is simply due to the microwave radiation from mobile phones and other devices!

More and more people are pointing to mobile phones and base stations as causes of ill health. There is talk of burnout, sleep disorders, cancer, asthma and allergies, disorders of reproduction … This week, a court in Geneva demanded the dismantling of a mobile phone mast precisely with reference to the perceived ill-health of the surrounding residents. The residents also received financial compensation for their suffering.

The other day you could read in Swedish newspapers that the most common mobile phones on the Swedish market have a radiation value between 1.7 watts per kilo body weight (Ericsson T28s) and 0.17 watts / kilo (Panasonic EB-GD 92). Brun, Persson and Salford used 500-5,000 times weaker radiation (0.4 milliwatts / kilograms) to open up the blood-brain barrier! We are part of a full-scale trial sanctioned by the Swedish government where we are all whole-body irradiated around the clock, regardless of where we are. Then it doesn’t feel safe to know that the Lund researchers were able to break through the blood-brain barrier with a radiation dose that is 5,000 times weaker than the Swedish (non-statutory) recommended value of 2 watts / kilo body weight! Nor does it feel reassuring to constantly read that “mobile phones are harmless”. Who, I ask, who can guarantee this !?

VERY UNCOMFORTABLE is that researchers have recently shown that prions can migrate from mother to foetus. The foetus is normally protected by a membrane between its blood and the uterine tissue, the blood-placenta barrier.

We must assume that this barrier can also be damaged by very weak mobile phone radiation, just like the blood-brain barrier! Will Mad Cow Disease break out in Sweden? Yes, I definitely think so. We will soon have 30,000 new base stations for mobile telephony’s new 3G / UMTS, we will have millions of local transmitters / receivers in the form of Bluetooth systems. Does this feel safe? Is it really enough for companies or authorities to stubbornly repeat: “… there are hundreds of reports that show no biological effect”? Would you feel safe with hundreds of harmless snakes in the woods – while you have a poisonous cobra around your neck?

What does the Swedish Radiation Protection Institute do? I do not know. What exactly are our other authorities doing to find out the seriousness of the above? I do not know. What is the government doing? I do not know.

The only thing I know is that there is a risk that there is a risk. If I’m wrong in my fears, well, then you can laugh at me. But if I’m right, can I then laugh …?

With my very best regards

Yours sincerely

Olle Johansson

Aftonbladet

12 March 2001