Comparing iPhone vs. Samsung Android emission of biologically harmful radiation

Comparing iPhone vs. Samsung Android emission of biologically harmful radiation — by Reza Ganjavi

1.56K subscribers

Please click SUBSCRIBE button or click: https://www.youtube.com/c/RezaGanjavi… Test setting: WiFi off, Bluetooth off, Airplane mode off, data off. This is the quietest setting on the phone which allows it to still receive calls. The radiation (RF.EMF is biologically harmful but the current standards ignore biology, in favor of a crooked corrupt wireless industry and their captured government regulators. See http://www.emfcrisis.com Also see: http://www.rezamusic.com, http://www.facebook.com/rganjavi (add me) Also visit my old channel: http://youtube.com/c/rezaganjavioldch… Produced by Reza Ganjavi. All Rights Reserved. For additional information contact: info–at–rezamusic–dot–com.

SHOW LESS

WIRELESS KILLS TREES…SO WHAT DO YOU THINK IT IS DOING TO US?

http://www.electricalpollution.com
Wireless Kills Trees

We rely on plants and trees for our very lives, even people living in the most plant-free areas of major cities rely on plants for their existence.Plants produce the oxygen we breathe and are the basis of all the food we eat. Even the most carnivorous amongst us rely on plants because the animals we consume all consume plants. Our climate is dependent on trees, sufficient numbers of trees, which is why the destruction of the Amazon rain forest is so disastrous.

Contrary to industry representations, wireless technology is neither a sustainable nor environmentally-friendly technology because wireless connectivity uses far more energy than wired connectivity.  According to Energy Consumption in Wired and Wireless Access Networks, “Wireless technologies will continue to consume at least 10 times more power than wired technologies when providing comparable access rates and traffic volumes. PON [passive optical networks] will continue to be the most energy-efficient access technology.” (http://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/rtucker/publications/files/energy-wired-wireless.pdf), even as technology becomes more energy efficient. A higher amount of energy is consumed in transmitting large amounts of information through the air (a medium that has high resistance and high level of signal absorption) compared to transmission via various corded communication connections (e.g., copper or fiber optic based). In fact, in a paper looking at the energy consumption of cloud computing, the authors state, “Our energy calculations show that by 2015, wireless cloud will consume up to 43 TWh, compared to only 9.2 TWh in 2012, an increase of 460%. This is an increase in carbon footprint from 6 megatonnes of CO2 in 2012 to up to 30 megatonnes of CO2 in 2015, the equivalent of adding 4.9 million cars to the roads. Up to 90% of this consumption is attributable to wireless access network technologies, data centres account for only 9%.”(emphasis added) (http://www.ceet.unimelb.edu.au/publications/ceet-white-paper-wireless-cloud.pdf) It is clear from the discussion, that cloud computing does not save energy unless it displaces local computing power, otherwise it just increases energy consumption, especially when accessed wirelessly.

Wireless devices use radiofrequency (RF) radiation sent indiscriminately through the air to communicate. The ambient levels of RF radiation have increased rapidly with the proliferation of wireless technology. Unfortunately, regulators around the globe have had their heads in the sand, refusing to believe that RF radiation emitted by common wireless devices can have biological effects, unless they cook you. Regulations in the U.S., Canada and many other parts of the world are based on the avoidance of thermal harm, not protection from non-thermal detrimental biological effects, despite numerous studies documenting their existence. See http://www.emfscientist.orghttp://www.mainecoalitiontostopsmartmeters.org/?p=1469, and http://www.bioinitiative.org.

Radiation from wireless technology is now jeopardizing the health of our trees and other plants!Adverse Influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling Aspen Seedlings: Preliminary Observations by Katie Haggerty, a sham-controlled experiment using aspen seedlings, found that ambient RF levels at the experimental site in Colorado, U.S.A, were high enough to cause necrotic lesions on the leaves, decrease leader length and leaf area, and suppress fall anthocyanin production.

According to Haggerty (citing supporting references), suppression of fall anthocyanin production is quite detrimental to the trees.

During fall leaf senescence photosynthetic mechanisms become vulnerable to damage by visible light. Anthocyanins shield the photosynthetic apparatus from high light levels, preventing photoinhibition and damage to leaf tissue due to light stress. Transport of foliar nutrients requires energy provided by photosynthesis, and since the majority of nutrients in overwintering deciduous trees are derived from foliar nutrient transport during autumn leaf senescence, differences in anthocyanin production could have major effects on plant fitness.

Absence of proper fall color has serious health implications for the trees, but it has serious economic implications for many parts of the country that rely on fall color tourists for a major portion of their income. Below is a picture of our basswood which would normally turn a beautiful yellow color, instead of this crinkly brownish. It lost all its leaves shortly after this picture was taken. It never turned the lovely yellow color.

Other trees have turned colors more naturally, but then leaves in certain areas turn brown and crunchy.

Most of our cottonwoods lost their leaves when they were a necrotic off-green. Definitely not a look that anyone is going to travel to see (pictures below from September 18, 2016). There is a WiFi tower about a mile to the right of the trees in the picture below.

READ FULL ARTICLE AT:  http://www.electricalpollution.com/WirelessKillsTrees.html

 

CHD in the First Direct Debate with Telecom on 5G – Don’t Miss!

CHD in the First Direct Debate with Telecom on 5G – Don’t Miss!

By Dafna Tachover, Director, CHD’s 5G and Wireless Harms Project

JUNE 19, 2020

On June 23rd, 2020, 1:00 p.m. Eastern 10:00 am Pacific, Children’s Health Defense will take part in the first ever direct debate with the telecom industry, titled: “5G – Friend or Foe?”

The event is organized by GCS Connect, part of GCS Recruitment, located in Dublin. GCS is a leading international Telecom and Hi-Tech recruitment company with offices in Europe, USA and Asia and it has been at the forefront of digital transformation, recruiting professionals for the leading telecom companies around the world.

As part of the GCS Webinar program, they decided to address the conflicting information we have been seeing and hearing in the news about the 5G rollout. They gathered a panel of 5G experts from around the globe from both sides of the isle, to explain their position and answer questions.

The Children’s Health Defense is excited for this opportunity. We are looking forward to speaking directly to those who invent this technology and deploy it, and to educate them about the science and the extent of the adverse health effects and tragedies their technology has been creating. Our hope is that this will get the telecom companies to invest in developing safer technologies and help lead to a much needed change.

June 23rd, 2020,
1:00 p.m. Eastern 10:00 am Pacific

Register for your spot today!

 

The Telecom Industry Panelists: 

Wahaj Tahir – Director of Wireless RF Engineering at GCI Liberty Inc. – Alaska, United States.

Recently, Wahaj was involved in turning up 5G in GCI’s network in Alaska. He has spent time working with industry leaders such as Ericsson, LCC, Motorola and Clearwire in the past.

Ivan Atanasovski – 4G/5G Radio Optimization Consultant at Three – UK

Ivan Atanasovski has more than 8 years of experience in Telecommunications and is currently working on a 5G rollout project. In addition to his knowledge of the previous mobile generations (2G, 3G, 4G), in the last two years he is mostly dedicated to 5G projects in relation to 5G biddings, 5G trainings, 5G Use-cases & 5G rollout.

Peter Curnow-Ford – Founder & Managing Partner – Viatec Associates – London, UK – With 30+ years’ experience in global telecoms and IT, Peter founded Viatec Associates in 2002 to assist organisations with decision making in the cellular, satellite, and wireless landscape.

The Stop 5G Panelists:

Dr. Paul Héroux – Professor, Physicist, and Toxicologist – McGill University – Montreal, Canada

Dr. Paul Héroux is a physicist with experience in electrical engineering (15 years), and in the health sciences (33 years). Dr. Paul Héroux currently teaches Toxicology, Hearing Conservation, and Health Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation to Occupational Health and Engineering students at McGill’s Faculty of Medicine.

Dafna Tachover – Senior Attorney & Director of 5G Wireless Harms project of the Children’s Health Defense, a non-profit organization chaired by Robert F. Kennedy’s Jr, dedicated to eliminating the epidemic of chronic sickness in children from environmental toxins including wireless radiation. Dafna led a Supreme Court case in Israel to stop the deployment of Wi-Fi in Israel’s schools, and she is now leading CHD’s case against the Federal Communications Commission, challenging its decision not to review its guidelines regarding wireless health effects.

Register for your spot today!

 

CHD in the First Direct Debate with Telecom on 5G – Don’t Miss!