NYC-Every meter Replaced without “Pilot” at Ratepayers expense!!

We recently talked about how AARP will sometimes attack smart meters on a state by state basis, usually due to costs …
Con Ed shouldn’t stick NYers w/ $1.2B bill for “smart meters” w/o testing benefits first …

https://twitter.com/AARPNY/status/745653834253541377

AARP strongly recommends the Commission reconsider its approval of Con Edison’s $1.2 billion smart meter investment. AARP believes there has been no opportunity to

fully explore Con Edison’s estimated costs or the benefits of this technology. Under the PSC approach, this significant expense will be paid for by Con Edison’s residential customers long before there is any proof that the alleged benefits will occur or in what amount. Why wasn’t a pilot approach considered before allowing Con Edison to replace every meter in NYC at ratepayer expense?

Why are ratepayers stuck paying this billion-dollar expense before anyone can verify and determine this new policy to be useful and beneficial to the people paying the bill?

http://states.aarp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Testimony-Con-Ed-6-21-16-pdf.pdf

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s