Peter the Meter Reader evolving into George Jetson

Peter the Meter Reader evolving into George Jetson
May 16. 2015 6:44PM

Eversource Meter Reader Peter Lambert in the meter inventory room at the company’s Derry operations center, where the old and new technology co-mingle during the transition period. (Dave Solomon/Union Leader)

– See more at:

Peter the Meter Reader evolving into George Jetson


New Hampshire Union Leader

DERRY – Fans of the 1960s sitcom “Green Acres” may recall one of the colorful recurring characters, Peter the Meter Reader, whose hapless efforts to help bring electricity to the Douglas homestead ended with Oliver climbing a utility pole with an electric socket dangling from the top wire – a move that plunges New York City, nine eastern states and three Canadian provinces into darkness.

New Hampshire’s own Peter the Meter Reader – Peter Lambert of Derry – has never met a couple like Oliver and Lisa Douglas in his 13 years with PSNH, now Eversource, but he’s been chased by dogs and has chased away would-be burglars.

The 54-year-old father of two is fit, trim and fast. “I get paid to work out,” he says, in between near sprints from one lawn to another as he crisscrosses a Derry neighborhood with his recording device in hand, carefully eyeing one meter after another. (See related story.)

In a densely populated area like Derry, he can read more than 1,600 meters a day. In nearby Chester, 263 meters is a good day’s work.

Soon, none of that will matter. There are only 49 traditional meter readers still working in the state, and by the summer of 2016, there will be none.

Eversource is the only one of the state’s four electric distribution utilities that still uses old analog meters that have to be read and manually recorded on-site. The other three (Unitil, Liberty and the New Hampshire Electric Coop) have already switched to digital meters whose contents can be transmitted by radio signals or over utility lines.

With by far the largest franchise area in the state (70 percent of the market), Eversource has more than 550,000 meters to switch over, in a process that began in late 2013, will continue this year and wrap up in 2016.

Half way there

Electrical subcontractors working for the meter manufacturer Itron have completed about half the project so far, with 225,000 digital meters successfully installed, according to Eversource spokesman Martin Murray.

“The Nashua region is done, has been done for some time,” he said. “The Manchester region is largely done, and we’re now in Keene and the Monadnock region.”

The company has gone from nearly 100 meter readers before the project began, to just under 50 today. When all is said and done, only 10 will remain. Their primary responsibility will be to drive a “remote-read” vehicle through a service area, collecting signals from meters along the way.

Murray said the company has so far been able to manage the reduction in labor through retirements and reassignments, without resorting to layoffs.

Eversource is investing $40 million in the conversion, which covers all aspects of the new program, including the meters, installation and all the hardware and software. The company has agreed to forgo another rate case with the Public Utilities Commission until 2017, assuming a tentative agreement over the sale of Eversource power plants is approved, which means recovery of costs for the project is at least two to three years down the road.

“We will seek, during some future rate case, to begin recovery of our capital expense,” Murray said. Such an expense is typically recovered over a number of years, which would be determined as part of the PUC process.

“But the estimated $6 million in annual savings is in current dollars and will benefit customers immediately,” he said, “as it will be realized and accounted for immediately.”

No more estimates

Other benefits to customers include the end to estimated meter reads, which would happen if the 100 readers just couldn’t get to every meter every 30 days.

And those homeowners who faithfully shoveled a path to the meter need not bother once the change occurs on their property

The changeover had generated some concerns and some complaints. The PUC has received numerous calls over the past year from property owners who thought the changeover was to a “smart meter,” a much more sophisticated device that can monitor and even control electricity consumption in real time.

“The majority of the calls relate to a general misunderstanding of AMR meters and the belief that Eversource is installing smart meters,” said Amanda Noonan in the PUC Office of Consumer Affairs. “We received one call regarding damage to an appliance that the customer believed to be related to the meter replacement.”

Murray said the complaints have ranged from people who claim the installer left a tire scuff mark in their driveway, to loss of computer data, “to an appliance that may not work in the same manner that it did before.”

“Most complaints appear to be associated with the temporary loss of power, which can happen at any time for a host of reasons,” he said. “In most cases, the people who have contacted us have been satisfied with the explanation. There have been a handful of people who claim they may have suffered some equipment or appliance damage, they believe, as a result of a power interruption.”

Smart meters years away

Eversource is working with those customers to investigate and determine if the changeover was the cause of the problem.

Although the New Hampshire Electric Cooperative recently completed a two-year experiment with 400 smart meters, Murray predicted use of smart meters in New Hampshire is a long way off.

 “We don’t anticipate that we’re going to have smart meters installed or implemented in New Hampshire any time in the near future,” he said, estimating the cost of such a project for Eversource in the $140 million to $165 million range.

 Beyond cost, the biggest obstacle is a state law requiring customer permission for smart metering.

 “State law does not make it easy,” he said. “There would be an opportunity for customers to opt out. Then we would have invested a very large sum of money for a system that some or many are not even using.”

– See more at:

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


 The State of Massachusetts is again accused of stonewalling, lying, deflecting, avoiding and dismissing their responsibilities to enforce the “Pure Tone” noise regulations.  The Board of Health according to what we were told by DEP and the local board of health, that the local board of health can defer to DEP for action in these violations.   Our local board of health Peter J. Kolodziej, stated at the time in 2008 that he was not equipped or understood what pure tones are, so our complaints were handled by the MADEP.  We tried seeking assistance from the town and they would not assist us in our Noise complaints.
The noise is caused by the smart meter technology imposed on the power grid.  This issue is even bigger than wind turbines because it is ubiquitous!
The MADEP took control for over 4 years with the complaint and did nothing to enforce the laws.  They knew the pure tones were present 24/7 in our town and closed the case. They knew we are suffering from the acoustic assault.  They need to be held accountable for their blatant negligence and corruption…….Sandaura
Massachusetts Noise Laws
Air Pollution Control Regulations
Regulation 310 CMR 7.10: Noise
  • Board of Health waits to decide any further Independence turbine restrictions

  • It’s looking more likely that the Board of Health will have a vote in July or August to decide whether to place further restrictions on operation of the the Independence wind turbine.

    Board of Health member David Kennedy, who had believed he would be able to vote on turbine matters based on previous discussions with the state Ethics Commission, won’t be able to vote. He recent recently heard from the state that they needed more information from him first.

    Kennedy lives on Copper Beech Drive, one of the roads affected by turbine noise. After recusing himself from the discussion, he was successful in pushing for HMMH to agree to release previously unreleased data from two different dates when sound was measured.

    Representatives from the consultant and Massachusetts Clean Energy Center argued that the data was contaminated and unreliable, but agreed to share the raw data. Kennedy cited the need for transparency when making his request.