Steve Weller, Vice President of Stop Smart Meters Australia, has recently put together an incredibly comprehensive presentation regarding the increasingly widespread problem of RF/ EMF pollution causing (and exacerbating) Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity. On May 20th,
These are the side affects from using a system that touts being able to pass over transformers. The power is off at the breaker but the G3-PLC system keeps delivering a pulsed field around the entire perimeter. This all is happening without a smart meter but with an Elstar analog. There is no escaping this weapon. The electrical engineers should get together with some brain surgeons to understand what they are creating. I have pleaded for the power company to stop sending this 500KHz-5KHz frequency but they continue to do so. I’m sure this is wreaking havoc on all my appliances. Why are all the power companies delivering more than 60 Hertz to our appliances?
Smart meters’ electronic signals pose a health risk: Okanagan-Similkameen district
Posted: Jun 03, 2015 2:38 AM PTLast Updated: Jun 03, 2015 7:25 AM PT
CBC News Posted: Jun 03, 2015 2:38 AM PTLast Updated: Jun 03, 2015 7:25 AM PT
The Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen is calling for an immediate stop to the installation of smart meters.
The district’s board chair, Mark Pendergraft, said a recent report from 200 scientists about radiation from wireless devices, including smart meters, has convinced the board that they are a danger.
- Smart meter safety not enough of a priority for SaskPower: review
- Smart meter standoff means $35 monthly charge for tenants
- ‘Smart’ meter debate escalates in B.C.
He said the board has an obligation under the Public Health Act to protect its constituents from smart meters, which he said have a high output of electronic signals over a short period of time.
Pendergraft said he has addressed a letter on the subject to the B.C. premier, health minister and the provincial health officer.
“So that is why we were asking them to take a second look at it and really confirm whether, in particular, B.C. is comfortable with the smart meter,” said Pendergraft.
According to Fortis B.C., signals from smart meters are well below recently revised Health Canada guidelines, and concerned customers can opt to have the wireless signal disabled on the new meters.
The reason there are is such a small group in comparison to the customer base in each state is simple; The majority of the customers do not have any information from the utilities that would deter them from wanting a smart meter on their homes. How can the utility tell the truth about the dangers of such a technology? That would defeat the purposes of making money. Business does not have that kind of conscience. So it is a David and Goliath situation. The people on the front lines fighting for everyone’s safety does not have the resources nor the media, government, experts on their side to get the word out there in a way that the public will take seriously. As long as the industry and government have paid hacks to say it is safe the naïve majority is allowing the exposure to the radiation pollution…..Sandaura
Wednesday, June 03, 2015
Utilities spread ‘smart meters’ across Maryland, but some homeowners hold out
BALTIMORE — In August 2010, Baltimore Gas and Electric received permission from the Maryland Public Service Commission to overhaul its network of electric and gas meters that perch on the walls of homes and businesses in 10 counties and the city of Baltimore. Inspired by programs in California and Florida and bolstered by a $200 million federal grant, the utility set a plan in motion to replace customers’ electric and gas meters with a grid of digital “smart meters,” which continually send energy consumption data wirelessly to the utility.
“There were a number of reasons to do it,” said Baltimore Gas and Electric smart grid director Michael Butts. “One is we knew that [smart meters] could improve customer service, and there were programs that we could give to our customers that could help save money.”
Other benefits of a “smart grid” include more accurate monthly bills, quicker response to power outages and less energy use across BGE’s service area, Butts said.
For the most part, the rollout, which is nearing completion, has gone smoothly. BGE alone has changed out more than a million old-style analog or digital meters, replacing spinning dials with digital displays and online charts. Customers can log in to a website to view their power use down to the minute, and meter-readers have been retrained for other positions as radio-frequency signals in the air replace people and trucks sweeping the neighborhoods.
But on the other side of the power line is a population of holdouts and their self-appointed advocates: a band of concerned residents who dispute nearly every claim they’ve heard from utilities across the state about the new grid.
The holdouts are a relatively small group — about 26,000 from BGE, Pepco and Delmarva Power’s combined customer base of a few million — but they’ve made their voices heard very clearly in government and their communities.
Maryland Smart Meter Awareness, an anti-smart meter advocacy group, sprung up in a quiet northwestern Baltimore City suburb where analog meters still spin and many lawns and car bumpers sport red-and-white “Say NO To Smart Meters” signs.
The group’s 1,100 members are the sort of people a video on BGE’s website dismisses as “conspiracy theorists” — but they say they’re protecting Maryland’s citizens from physical and financial harm.
“I initially was very skeptical — you know, there’s a lot of stuff coming out there that’s not well-founded, and I kind of avoided looking into it,” said Jonathan Libber, a retired Environmental Protection Agency lawyer who now serves as president of Maryland Smart Meter Awareness. “Finally, I started looking into it. I said, ‘Well, this is really bad stuff.’”
Health concerns about smart meters
Libber said he is concerned the radio-frequency microwaves smart meters emit could cause a host of health problems, from headaches to insomnia to cancer. It’s a contentious claim, given that microwave ovens, wireless Internet routers and cellphones all produce the same frequency of radiation.
But Libber said there hasn’t been enough research to determine how radio-frequency radiation affects humans.
“If this were a new drug, or, you know, a new X-ray machine, it’d have to go through all sorts of testing before it would be used on the population,” he said. “Smart meters kind of fall in the regulatory cracks — it’s not a food, it’s not a chemical that’s covered by [the Occupational Safety and Health Administration] or [the Environmental Protection Agency] — it’s not a consumer product, so they’ve got a free ride.”
BGE’s sizable online guide to smart meter concerns cites Federal Communications Commission standards for radio-frequency waves, which occupy the section of the electromagnetic spectrum between 3 kilohertz and 300 gigahertz, below the visual spectrum of light in terms of energy.
“At relatively low levels of exposure to RF radiation, i.e., levels lower than those that would produce significant heating; the evidence for production of harmful biological effects is ambiguous and unproven,” according to the Federal Communications Commission’s Radio Frequency Safety guide.
The guide mentions “a number of reports” from scientists who found biological effects from low-level radio-frequency radiation, but adds that “in most cases, further experimental research has been unable to reproduce these effects.”
The government agency and anti-smart meter activists agree more research is needed. But the two sides disagree on whether that’s a cause for caution.
Smart meters communicate with the grid for less than two minutes per day, emitting a comparable amount of radiation to a 10-second cellphone call, according to BGE.
Ronald Powell, a physicist who worked at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and who is now affiliated with Maryland Smart Meter Awareness, said when it comes to radio-frequency technology, “our society has gotten ahead of the research community” with plentiful wireless devices.
“Human beings are very complicated biological systems, and it’s going to take a while to ferret out everything.” But in the meantime, Powell said, “the last thing we want to do is to mandate this on the public” through wireless smart meters.
The smart-meter opponents point to stories of people who developed new or aggravated symptoms after being exposed to smart meters. Some of these people have been diagnosed with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, which is not widely recognized by the medical community, Libber said.
Libber said he avoids excess radio-frequency radiation by keeping his wireless Internet router in an air duct behind a metal vent, putting his cordless phone transmitter in the basement and holding his cellphone away from his ear when he makes a call.
“We’re not Luddites, OK? Most of our people have cellphones and Wi-Fi and all that kind of stuff,” Libber said. “But we have to develop a hygiene in this country on how you deal with all this RF coming in.”
History of BGE’s meters
While Maryland Smart Meter Awareness paints the smart grid as a burgeoning public health nightmare, Butts and BGE portray it as an exciting opportunity years in the making.
“We actually started looking at smart meters as early as 2007,” Butts said. “We weren’t a leader, but I’d say we were a fast follower in the industry.”
After conducting a pilot program of about 5,300 electric and gas meters in Westminster and Baltimore in summer 2008, the utility obtained permission from the state’s Public Service Commission in August 2010 to upgrade its entire grid with smart metering technology.
There were about 1.9 million meters to change, Butts said, as well as new information technology infrastructure to support the smart meters. BGE divided its service territory into 16 sections and in 2012 began upgrading one after the other with the help of contractor Grid One Solutions Inc.
“We wanted to start in outdoor, primarily outdoor areas in order to test our processes before we got to what we figured would be … the more difficult areas that had more indoor accounts” — namely, Baltimore and its immediate surroundings, Butts said.
A $200 million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant — one of six awarded nationwide for smart grids, Butts said — helped offset the project cost of about $452 million. And BGE’s 2012 merger with Chicago-based Exelon gave the company more information to use in its smart grid implementation.
“Through the merger, we were able to collaborate with the other utility companies that are now part of Exelon,” Butts said. “So, we now have ComEd [in Illinois] and PECO [in Philadelphia] that are part of our Exelon Corporation, and we were able to collaborate with them ’cause they’re also doing the same meter rollouts.”
BGE has brought about 90 percent of its electric customers and about 75 percent of its gas customers into the smart grid so far, installing more than 1.1 million smart meters.
Meanwhile, Pepco and Delmarva Power have finished their smart grid rollouts. A Pepco spokesman wrote in an email that about 793,000 smart grid customers in Maryland, Washington, D.C., and New Jersey have saved more than 5.5 million kilowatt-hours and received more than $7.5 million in credits on their energy bills since Pepco began upgrading its meters in 2010.
BGE’s is by far the largest smart grid in the state; by way of comparison, Pepco and Delmarva have installed about 730,000 smart meters combined in Maryland. But BGE has also encountered the highest rate of customers in the state who have opted out of the smart grid — about 1.5 percent, or 23,000. That’s compared to about 0.2 percent for Pepco and 0.5 percent for Delmarva.
In May 2012, the Public Service Commission issued a decision temporarily allowing state residents to write in to their utilities to refuse installation of a smart meter. About 40,000 people did so, Libber said.
But in 2014, the commission allowed BGE, Pepco, Delmarva and Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, which is currently conducting a smart meter pilot program, to charge opt-out fees for customers who refuse smart meters. Now, an opt-out customer must pay $75 up front, plus a monthly charge — $11 for BGE, $12 for SMECO, $14 for Pepco and $17 for Delmarva. With that change, the opt-out population has dropped by about half, Libber said.
“The opt-out fees are really grossly unfair,” he said. “It’s really utility protection money.”
The four utilities had requested permission to charge even more. BGE sought an opt-out fee of $100 up front and $15 monthly from its customers, while SMECO asked for $105.32 and $34.94. Pepco and Delmarva requested $100 up front and $58 per month.
“[Utilities] included costs that were clearly inappropriate, totally excluded savings that would accrue to them through people who kept their old meter,” Libber said.
Butts said the fees were calculated based on the cost of maintaining a legacy metering grid alongside the new smart grid.
“When a customer opts out of the smart meter, we now have to maintain two meter reading systems — the old system that reads the old meter and the new system that reads the new smart meter,” Butts said. “And the old meter isn’t as efficient as the new meter, and there’s costs that are associated with maintaining that system.”
The opt-out policy was the subject of two bills in the Maryland General Assembly this year. Sen. Nathaniel McFadden (D-Baltimore) and Del. Glen Glass (R-Harford) worked with Maryland Smart Meter Awareness on legislation that would have brought back the free opt-out policy.
McFadden, a former Baltimore principal who still works with the school system, said while he personally uses smart meters, his constituents should be able to refuse them if they wish without facing a financial burden.
“I thought that [the fee] was rather excessive, especially when in my district I represent so many people with low income, fixed income,” he said. “If you’re on Social Security or you’re low-income like many of my residents are, $11 is a considerable amount of money.”
Glass, an Army veteran and professional truck driver, said he opposes smart meters because they pose health risks, have inexplicably caused people’s bills to double or triple, and represent “a Big Brother invasion of privacy” because they allow utilities to invade customers’ privacy by monitoring their power use on a daily basis. He said BGE installed a smart meter on his home last year and his bill doubled for the 23 days before he opted out.
“The smart meters only benefit the utility companies,” he said. “It’s all about money. It’s not about human beings.”
Glass has sponsored an opt-out bill each year since 2012, but each one has failed. This year, his and McFadden’s bills both died in committee.
“The Republicans and the Democrats killed my bill,” Glass said. “Bipartisan. You got an urban Democrat on one side, you got a conservative Republican on the other. And his people killed his bill and my people killed my bill.”
Boon or burden?
Smart-meter customers across the state enjoy several indisputable benefits from being on the new grids.
“If you go back before smart meters, you know, you knew about how much your bill was when you got your bill in the mail,” Butts said. “Well, right now, if you have a smart meter, you can go online and you can see how much your bill is going to be as you go through the month. … And customers are also getting what we call home energy reports. These are reports that give them information about their energy usage and compare them to like customers, and that’s actually helped customers be more focused on energy use.”
BGE’s meters also allow it to pinpoint power outages more quickly and with fewer employees searching on the road, he said.
“If you go back about a year ago, we had a pretty good ice storm” in Harford, Baltimore and Carroll counties, Butts said. “We had about 38 percent of the meters installed up in that area, and in that one storm we were able to avoid almost 900 truck pulls. Nine hundred times we didn’t have to send crews out to a location to make sure the customer was back in service because we could tell that already with the smart meters.”
He added that BGE still encourages its customers to report outages by phone, however, as some meters might not communicate with the grid during a major outage.
On the company side, Butts said, BGE has avoided more than 70,000 truck pulls thanks to the smart grid, in part because the company can turn a smart meter on and off remotely to turn a customer’s power on and off — for example, if the customer moves. He also said the company has not fired any of its meter readers, instead retraining them for other positions.
Anti-smart meter advocates fear the kill-switch technology makes homeowners vulnerable to online hackers.
Furthermore, the monitoring capability critics call an invasion of privacy can be used to catch people who tamper with power lines or meters to steal electricity from the system, Butts said.
Butts said BGE hopes to reduce its customers’ energy use by at least 1 percent by providing them with more detailed information about their electricity and also by offering rebates for customers who use less power on designated Energy Savings Days.
But McFadden and Glass objected to what they called utilities’ plan to dictate customers’ behavior.
“I mean, that’s your responsibility,” McFadden said. “That’s just like government trying to manage everything — now you have a utility in the same role, supported by the government, telling the public how to manage their families, and … it’s kind of overbearing.”
The advocates also worry that ratepayers will eventually be stuck with the bill for the smart grid projects across the state, though utilities must first prove to the Public Service Commission that the switch was worth it.
In such a distrustful environment, the two sides don’t agree on much around smart meters — the science behind them, the benefits and costs they bring, even the conditions under which utility customers can refuse to adopt them.
It’s a lopsided fight, too: On one side are huge companies and the U.S. government; on the other, people invoking Big Brother from George Orwell’s “1984” and disputed medical diagnoses.
But for supporters and opponents, smart meters are much more important than their unobtrusive appearance suggests.
“People don’t think of a meter as [something that] could harm you — you know, a meter is a meter, what’s the big deal?” Libber said. “But it really is a big deal.”
&amp;lt;a href=”http://rotator.adjuggler.com/servlet/ajrotator/1051857/0/cj/V1238442C12J-573J8100K93956160E9A5F9001454CF001454CDQ00103419QQL2787870G00G0Q0DE8A299000001010000G0PG30H36W82aff9cf82DW4e7812DW4468b2DW4b2582DX12a07023df7c0bG0G045/http://bs.serving-sys.com/BurstingPipe/adServer.bs?cn=brd&amp;amp;FlightID=12096848&amp;amp;Page=&amp;amp;PluID=0&amp;amp;Pos=931370238″ target=”_blank”&amp;gt;&amp;lt;img src=”http://bs.serving-sys.com/BurstingPipe/adServer.bs?cn=bsr&amp;amp;FlightID=12096848&amp;amp;Page=&amp;amp;PluID=0&amp;amp;Pos=931370238″ border=0 width=980 height=90&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;
Smart meters causes a debate for MLGW customers
Memphis Light, Gas and Water wanted $240 million for smart meters.
But not everyone thought that was a good idea, and they voiced those concerns loud and clear in front of City Council members.
“I want to make it clear that citizens cannot tolerate higher bills due to an unnecessary $240 million purchase ,” said a concerned citizen.
Women who were wearing “stop smart meters” badges said they didn’t want the smart meters.
Some said it’s an invasion of privacy.
They were also concerned about the $240 million price tag.
“We need more public meetings from citizens regarding this. The citizens should not be at the mercy of 12 or 13 people,” said a citizen.
The time for public discussion came and went.
MLGW said it has already installed about 60,000 smart meters across Shelby County.
Gayle Carson with MLGW said while it would cost a lot to make the change, it ends up saving everyone money.
“Memphis Light, Gas and Water would like to take our customers to the next level. We would like to provide better and efficient service to our customers and better readings,” she said.
Two years ago, an On Your Side Investigation showed there was very little difference in how much customers paid a smart meter compared to what you’re paying now.
Some said it just eliminates the meter reader, but Council Member Joe Brown said he wasn’t sure the city should sign off on MLGW’s plan.
“I’m just saying this is not the time to move 240 million from a utility over a five year period from a utility company,” he said.
Carson said customers could opt out if they wish to do so and there’s no possible way for the meter to “spy” on you.