Documentary on The Reality is not at all what we think it is

Private Banks (Quotation) THOMAS JEFFERSON

Quotation: “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered…I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies… The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”


  1. “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.”

OKLAHOMA-Owasso man fighting to stop deployment of ‘smart meters’

Owasso man fighting to stop deployment of ‘smart meters’

Joe Esposito says he has proof we’re bathing in radiation as it is

Joe Esposito measures EMF radiation in his Owasso home, March 17, 2015
Esposito uses a device called an HFE 35c High Frequency Analyzer

By Russell Mills

OWASSO, Okla. —

There’s indisputable, measurable scientific evidence that the amount of background radiation we all live in has increased dramatically in recent years.

The question then becomes how to determine the potential health risks of that radiation, but that kind of research takes time and money.

Meanwhile, utility companies around the country are building massive networks of so-called “smart meters,”

which emit pulses of energy up to tens of thousands a time a day.

Owasso resident Joe Esposito, a former US Marine with expertise in electronics and a degree in physiology tells KRMG the Public Service Company of Oklahoma installed a smart meter on his home after he specifically requested them not to do so.

When he and his wife objected, they shut off his electric service completely.

Eventually, after paying the company more than $1,000, they installed a meter several yards from the home, but he continued suffering symptoms of what has become known in the medical field as electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

In July, 2014, Canadian physicians appealed to Health Canada to protect citizens against radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure.

They wrote:

Many recent and emerging studies from university departments and scientific sources throughout the world support the assertion that energy from wireless devices may be causatively linked to various health problems including reproductive compromise, developmental impacts, hormonal dysregulation and cancer.

But PSO, OG&E, and a host of water, natural gas, and electric utilities around the country continue to install smart meters, which emit fairly strong bursts of RF radiation, without any actual investigation into the potential health effects.

Smart meters, of course, are not the only source of RF radiation.

Everything from cell phones to baby monitors also operate in those frequencies, but some experts warn that the smart meters are “the worst of the worst.”

Esposito has created a website dedicated to bringing about a moratorium on the installation of smart meters in Oklahoma.

But so far, the utilities continue to install the devices, only recently even considering giving customers an “opt out” alternative.

That opt out, Esposito argues, doesn’t relieve them of the obligation to at least study the potential health effects on the millions of customers who don’t refuse the smart meters.

Meanwhile, objections regarding privacy and a potential fire risk associated with the devices are being voiced by other consumer advocates.

If you are questioning why our Government is not making decisions to Better, instead of, Harm our Lives…

John F Kennedy spoke out about the insidious and corrupt cancer in our culture, that being, Secret or closed Societies,  controlling the outcome of our lives.  Could this be why he was murdered?  Clearly, President Kennedy was warning us.

No public figure, elected or otherwise, and/or, in any capacity, whereas. their decision making effects the outcome of the quality of our lives and how  we steward our planet, should be outed and all secrets within these secret societies be revealed once and for all so that we can rid our world of a corrupt, self serving, agenda that does not benefit our lives and freedoms as a whole.  We must take back our rights and freedoms by first coming to firm commitment that this dark and criminal behavior exists today and it has for quite some time.  It will continue to function, unless, “We, the People” believe it is our duty to fight for our freedom, for we are all in this together. Ignoring this responsibility is to remain complicit by non action; therefore you have no right to complain about the state of affairs and conditions we are leaving for our children and what we fought so hard for was for naught and there is no one else to blame, but those who remain conveniently ignorant….50 years later, we are devoid of progress!! We have descended; on all levels of our survival, this America, Inc is not good for us.

I was 12 when Kennedy was President.  He is the only President that moved me with his speeches.  He wasn’t perfect, but he certainly captured my short attention span at age 12.  My parents grew up in an age of innocence, which my mother carried with her, to her death.  Right now, I am sitting at my computer multi tasking, posting  very startling and disturbing information related to the smart meter issue because it is part of the process of connecting the dots as to why these horrific things are happening to us and we have a feeling of despair because there is a sense that we are being led without our consent down this destructive path. And while I am doing this I am in tears going through my mom’s recipe files of her favorites that brings me back to  a time that felt safer and hopeful. I cannot feel that way now, when we face such serious and urgent issues without proper leadership.

Do you believe in the Constitution of America?  If so, you better be asking yourselves what you can do for your country!……Sandaura

RF EMFs produce clear co-carcinogenic effects


In our opinion this is a crucial replication study that provides confirmation in a well-conducted in-vivo animal study that modulated microwave RF exposure can act as a co-carcinogen. This should be adequate to change its IARC 2B rating (possible human carcinogen) into the 2A category (probable human carcinogen).

Powerwatch News 08/03/2015

RF EMFs produce clear co-carcinogenic effects

On the same day that the EC’s SCENIHR released their long-awaited report [1] that concluded that we should not worry about any adverse health effects of EMF/RF fields, a new well conducted replication study [2] shows that long-term 3G/UMTS microwave exposure can act as a co-carcinogen and statistically significantly increase cancer growth at very low exposure levels, 50-fold below currently permitted levels.

Everyone using a 3G mobile phone or iPad or other tablet will be exposed at higher levels than this (0.04 W/kg). This study flags a big and important “wake up alarm call”.

These are levels that many, if not most, of our children are now being being exposed to WiFi at school, when using laptops and tablet PCs. Modern WiFi signals use RF modulation schemes that are similar to UMTS. It is vital that this study is repeated using similar exposure levels with various types and frequencies of WiFi.

In our opinion this is a crucial replication study that provides confirmation in a well-conducted in-vivo animal study that modulated microwave RF exposure can act as a co-carcinogen. This should be adequate to change its IARC 2B rating (possible human carcinogen) into the 2A category (probable human carcinogen).

The team was led by Professor Dr Alexander Lerchl and funded by a grant from the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Salzgitter, Germany. The funding agency defined the principal study design which was further developed with Dr Lerchl. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. In the past Dr Lerchl has been outspoken in his belief that current science had shown that low levels of microwave RF exposure could not be carcinogenic, so publication of this new, well conducted, study that shows the opposite is to his credit.

We call on the EC to issue a warning to the general public, and especially schools, and to urgently authorise funding for repeating this work using exposures to the the various WiFi modulation standards as soon as possible. As a UK-based group, we also call on the UK Department of Health to revise their Public Health England organisation’s website advice that currently supports schools in their use of WiFi for children of all ages. Powerwatch has long believed that this is unethical and we have repeatedly called for WiFi exposure related health research which, to our knowledge, has not been done by any official organisation.

The authors write:

“Previously published results from a pilot study with carcinogen-treated mice, however, suggested tumor-promoting effects of RF-EMF (Tillmann et al, 2010). We have performed a replication study using higher numbers of animals per group and including two additional exposure levels (0 (sham),

0.04, 0.4 and 2 W/kg SAR)… Numbers of tumors of the lungs and livers in exposed animals were significantly higher than in sham-exposed controls. In addition, lymphomas were also found to be significantly elevated by exposure. A clear dose-response effect is absent. We hypothesize that these tumor promoting effects may be caused by metabolic changes due to exposure.”

“Our study confirms and extends the previously published observations of tumor-promoting effects of life-long RF-EMF exposure… Since many of the tumor-promoting effects in our study were seen at low to moderate exposure levels (0.04 and 0.4 W/kg SAR), thus well below exposure limits for the users of mobile phones.”

“The fact that both studies found basically the same tumor-promoting effects at levels below the accepted (and in most countries legally defined) exposure limits for humans is worrying. Although animal experiments are generally not easily transferable to the situation in humans, the findings are a very clear indication that – in principal – tumor-promoting effects of life-long RF-EMF exposure may occur at levels supposedly too low to cause thermal effects.”

Some more details of the study:

In 2010, Tillmann and colleagues published a study [3] showing tumour-promoting effects of life-long exposure to microwave RF from 3G (UMTS) at moderate exposure levels in mice treated with a carcinogen while in-utero. Those results were potentially influenced by an unexpected infection. Their data showed clear effects of RF-EMF exposure on the incidences of lung and liver tumours. The exposed mice also had double the number of metastasising lung tumours compared with the non-exposed mice. SCENIHR 2015 does mention the Tillmann, et al, study on page 85 and say that a further study “might be informative”, but also state that peak exposures were high (5 W/kg), implying that there might be some thermal effect.

Lerchl’s team have replicated this study with higher numbers of mice per group in order to clarify whether the previously reported results could be confirmed. In addition, two additional SAR levels of exposure (low and high) were included in this well designed new study in order to investigate possible dose-response relationships.

What they have found are co-carcinogenic promotional effects at all levels of UMTS RF/microwave exposure. In fact, the lowest level of exposure shows the highest, statistically significant, promotional effect. Please see the Figure (above) reproduced from the paper.

The paper is available from the journal’s website, linked below.

We call on the German BfS to fund the Open Access publication of this paper. Most modern Public (tax) and Charity funded research now has a stipulated requirement for the results to be published as an Open Access (freely downloadable) paper and a sum is given in the grant to allow for this. This only involves the funders paying a few thousand euros (or USD) to the publishers, which is a small sum compared with the cost of the actual research.


1/. » The 2015 SCENIHR Opinion (PDF download)

2/. » A. Lerchl, M. Klose, K. Grote, A.F.X. Wilhelm, O. Spathmann, T. Fiedler, J.Streckert, V. Hansen, M. Clemens, Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.151

3/. » T. Tillmann, H. Ernst, J. Streckert, et al., Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 86 (2010)

This page was last updated at 06:48 GMT on 8 March 2015.

Click to access 2015-03-08-lerchl-RF-co-carcinogen.pdf